OHbaby! Forums : DiFfEReNt DaTeS https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/ Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Web Wiz Forums - All Rights Reserved. Sat, 27 Jun 2026 07:14:06 +0000 Wed, 03 May 2006 14:00:16 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 12.05 360 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2335 <![CDATA[OHbaby! Forums]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_images/web_wiz_forums.png https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/ <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : I had the same thing. First scan...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43392&title=different-dates#43392 Author: lizzle
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 2:00pm

I had the same thing. First scan said taine was due on the 11th, second one said 28th and he was born on the 17th. you'll probably give birth s9moetime in between.]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 14:00:16 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43392&title=different-dates#43392 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : i agree with everyone, the first...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43362&title=different-dates#43362 Author: mum2emj
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 1:18pm

i agree with everyone, the first scan date is the most accurate as the baby grows at a different rate.

i never had a real early scan with my first baby, but at the 20 week scan it had my dates at the 13th ocotber (edd lmp 10th octber) and then when i went in for a late scan to check bubs growth due to blood pressure etc...) it had my dates as 24th october. my daughter was born a few days later (at 39 weeks) weighing 6lb 2oz so was a reasonably small full term baby anyway!


Edited by mum2emj]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 13:18:36 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43362&title=different-dates#43362 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : yup me too - go for the late date...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43339&title=different-dates#43339 Author: mrs frantic
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 12:19pm

yup me too - go for the late date but maybe you will get an early surprise ]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 12:19:38 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43339&title=different-dates#43339 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : poor you, it must be really fustrating...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43334&title=different-dates#43334 Author: MILF
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 12:04pm

poor you, it must be really fustrating not having a proper date to go by - and aim for. i would go with september, simply because if baby is early you get a surprise, but if you aim for august and baby is late..... ugh]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 12:04:04 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43334&title=different-dates#43334 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : yap the earlier scan is ususally...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43332&title=different-dates#43332 Author: Roksana
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 12:02pm

yap the earlier scan is ususally correct....but like Maria said 2 weeks either way. My scan was exact....well my early scan said 31 Oct 05 and later it moved up and down...Zaara was born 31 Oct 05.

]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 12:02:25 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43332&title=different-dates#43332 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : Yep your midwife is right as babies...]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43328&title=different-dates#43328 Author: AlyAyde
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 11:54am

Yep your midwife is right as babies grow at the same rate for the first few weeks so measurements are correct for dating. But in saying that its only a weeks difference and your due date can be 2 weeks either side.]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 11:54:02 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43328&title=different-dates#43328 <![CDATA[DiFfEReNt DaTeS : Hey Ladies, Im soooo confused....]]> https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43323&title=different-dates#43323 Author: kellverona
Subject: 2335
Posted: 03 May 2006 at 11:48am

Hey Ladies,

Im soooo confused. My EDD was 28th August and 6 week scan said I was due 7th September, then my 12 Scan said I was a week and a bit further and the last scan I had at 22weeks said I was due 23rd August. I was told by midwife to go by first scan date as that is most accurate. (7th September) But two scans have said end of 23-28th August. What would I really go by? Baby also weighs approx 630gms, which by the books I have read is normal at 24 weeks. SOoo cnfused. Any suggestions. Shall I stick to 22 weeks or 24 weeks??  

]]> Wed, 03 May 2006 11:48:44 +0000 https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2335&PID=43323&title=different-dates#43323