Breech- 2 options- what wld YOU do?
Printed From: OHbaby!
Category: Pregnant
Forum Name: Pregnancy
Forum Description: Pregnant! Wanting to chat to other mums-to-be (or dads-to-be)? Share your thoughts, experiences, and ideas... This is that place!
URL: https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=36231
Printed Date: 29 April 2025 at 9:50pm Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: Breech- 2 options- what wld YOU do?
Posted By: Emmecat
Subject: Breech- 2 options- what wld YOU do?
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 7:47am
Ok so let me preempt this question by saying yes I realise this breech bubs of mine may still turn on her own, but I'm a planner and like to have a plan B in place, hence the question! 
So, this baby girl is still bum down with her head up by my right rib. I am getting scanned on the 26th to see what kind of breech she is...we suspect footling or similar as I am getting kicked low down, but obviously a scan will tell us this, as well as her size. So in the next 10 days or so till then I plan to use the swiss ball, swim etc etc.
BUT, my two options after that (and taking into account trying acupunture and moxibustion etc from 35 weeks) are these:
1) Book an elective c-section for a certain date, most likely around 38, poss 39 weeks. My mw reccomends this option as my labour history (of 1 baby lol) shows I labour fast and hard and she is worried if we leave labour to start naturally then we might encounter serious problems.
2) allow labour to start naturally, knowing the above and take a 'see what happens' approach, also knowing that yes sometimes babies turn at the last minute. MW wants me to know under those circumstances I would need to be able to get to hospital at the first contraction, which I'd need to do anyway if bubs was right way up! But that we'd need to be really quick and also acknowledge that once in the delivery suite there would be every chance of an emergencey section. And I think they'd only let me have this option if the baby is in the full split breech position anyway? Does that sound right? Think the mw said no way if the bubs is footling.
So, my question is- which option do you think you'd go with? I would obviously much prefer to birth 'naturally', mainly cos of the recovery period (I know how long it took me to get back on my feet after my emergency ab op earlier in the pregnancy!). Also I am worried that if I have a c-section then BF will be much harder to establish, or even happen (although Clodagh is still BF so I guess that might help?) 
I feel like I have to choose between 2 pretty sh*tty sounding Plan B's TBH. But would like to hear from more experienced Mums who might've had both types of births or just people who have different views on what they might do in this situation.
TIA 
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Replies:
Posted By: freckle
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:03am
Hugs Emmecat! I will really cross my fingers she turns and you don't have to make this choice... I have never had a c/s so can't really comment on recovery etc... But if I was in your situation, and had a history of fast labour I would be inclined to go with option 1 I think... I think I would be so nervous that I'd take too long to get there and things progressing too quickly ... the first option sounds much safer to me and in the end the main thing is you are baby are safe...
------------- mum to 3 lovely girls :D
|
Posted By: Kalimirella
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:16am
Depends on size too, I hope bridget from April thread comes talks in here. She had a not known breech baby in the ambulance on the way to hospital, need I add also a very quick labour!!
Her baby was only 5lbs though (perfect in every way just on the small side + full term) so that may have helped.
------------- Kiara is 3 and Teagan is 2, now we're expecting our long awaited 3rd! http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: newme
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:38am
A couple of tough options.
DS was breech and I had an elective c-section. BF was not a problem at all, we had skin to skin within 20 minutes or so and BF straight away...and I fed him until he was 22 months. So I wouldn't worry about that aspect of it.
From the two options you have put up, I would go for option 1. Simply because I would prefer the certainty of knowing what was going to happen.
My recovery from an elective c-section was pretty easy. I was up and about later the same day and off pain relief. It was a pain not being able to drive etc. I think recovery from an elective is easier than an emergency c-section. However, I am definately going for a home vbac this time!
Is ECV an option? If the baby is in footling breech, and as it is your 2nd pregnancy it may very well be successful?
|
Posted By: weegee
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 9:39am
I'd pick option 2 all the way. Addie turned by herself (with the help of homeopathic pulsatilla and bowen therapy) at almost 40 weeks, btw 
-------------
Mum to JJ, 4 July 2008 & Addie, 28 July 2010
|
Posted By: kebakat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 10:09am
Option 1 for the safety of you and bubs. If I laboured very quickly and it was urgent I got to hospital immediately under normal circumstances I wouldn't wanna complicate things with adding a breech birth to that.
I also wondered about ecv?
|
Posted By: fire_engine
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 10:11am
Are you going to try an ECV? How far are you from the hospital?
If it's breech and in good position (with chin down and not footling breech), then I'd probably try for a vag birth (assuming your first was a vag birth) but it's easy for me to say
------------- Mum to two wee boys
|
Posted By: fadeless
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 10:39am
I'd go with #2, i have had an emergency c/s and went on to have 4 Vbacs with my last baby he was 2lbs heavier than my c/s bubs. The c/s wasnt bad but i'd hate to have a c/s with older children, i found it very hard doing things after i had DD and she was the only 1 i had to deal with. Its a choice you have to be comfortable and positive about, good luck and sending you head down vibes!!
------------- DD 9 ~ DD 8 ~ DS 7 ~ DS 5 ~ DS 2 ~ DS 14mths ~ DD 3mths
|
Posted By: HippyMama
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 10:44am
I'd go with number 2, I guess, though I can understand you not feeling entirely happy with either option.
Even though we had no idea just how quickly DD2 would end up coming, I still stipulated that if she was known breech we would still be staying home - my mw's proviso was that she have her second mw there from the word go (rather than showing up later) as she had experience with catching breech babies and my primary mw hadn't.
Remember, do what YOU are happiest with, and you can say no to any thing (process or procedure) at any time if you are too uncomfortable with it.
------------- Mama to two earth walkers & two angels.
Remember, you are not managing an inconvenience; You are raising a human being. ~ Kittie Franz
Next Slingbabies! Meet - Friday 4th May !!
|
Posted By: EmDee
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 11:48am
I'd go with option 2. I had to consider it with Caleb, though he turned by himself thankfully around 34 or 35 weeks. For me, my mw was very confident that I could do a breech birth after 2 straight forward VBs and her confidence helped me gain confidence.
All the best with your decision, and I hope she turns for you so you don't have to worry about it anyway
------------- DS 8 DD 6 DS 4 DD 2
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 12:33pm
I so appreciate your repsonse so far. The answers to a few of your questions are:
- We live at least 30 minutes drive from Wellington hospital...and thats not accounting for peak hour traffic.
- DF will most likely be at work if I go into labour during the day and as a courier covering the greater Wgtn region, may well take a good while to get home. SO I will either be on my own or my Mum may be with me if she can come down and stay with us, however she's a little prone to panicking iykwim?
- Clodagh was an ambulance trip to hospital due to the sudden & hard onset of labour, although she was born in hospital (I also had bleeding when my waters broke).
- ECV is an option; I am concerned about the pain involved (call me shallow
) and also the danger of complications ie something going wrong during the procedure which may lead to an EARLY emergancy c-section, or worse, the cord getting caught or something (Clodagh's was wrapped around her neck a few times at birth so am a bit worried about that).
edited to add- my mw is wonderful, I have full confidence in her and she seems the right amount of 'crunchy' and medical-type person for me lol. She is not confident about birthing breech babes vaginally at all though, not just her, but anyone doing it in general I mean. Before we found out bubs was breech, we had a hypnobirthing water birth planned and she was well into it. And her first suggestions at turning babe incl acupuncture and moxibustion so she's def not just a 'cut it out' kind of peraon...which make me kind of believe her when she says birthing breech is more dangerous unless certain circumstances are met (my health, 2nd preg, babes position etc). She's not panicking or making me worried, all this is ME getting worried on my own lol).
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: freckle
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 1:16pm
You sound like you trust your MW and therefore, I would be inclined to listen to her and take her advice - she is the medical professional and has much more experience with birth than any of us ... I would just try and focus on doing what you can to facilitate baby turning and try not to stress too much at this stage...
------------- mum to 3 lovely girls :D
|
Posted By: fire_engine
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 1:17pm
TBH, the thing that would make me hesitate most is the MW. If she was experienced in breech, then that's one thing but if she's not confident then I would wonder if that would make you more likely to end up CSed anyway IYKWIM?
With the ECV, it might be worth talking with the OB about the risks/benefits of the ECV vs. risks/benefits of attempt at vag breech birth vs. risks/benefits of elective CS. Can your MW book you in to see the OB who is relatively OK with vag breech births?
Remember there's always the option that weegee had but didn't need - book in for an elective. when under epidural, then have a go at ECV .....
------------- Mum to two wee boys
|
Posted By: MyLilSquishy
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 1:25pm
DS was a footling breech and had a total of about 10 days head down. his head was under my left rib andhis left foot was engaged with his right foot sitcking out.
I had 3 ECVs (2x one day another a week later) and they HURT but I was wanting to try everything I could. also tried homeopathic pills and yoga and lying upside down with my butt on the couch amoung other things to try and turn him. the pain of the ECVs dissapates very quickly though... half an hour later and pain was gone.
I would suggest #1. (plan an ECS) because I would much rather have it planned and calm with DP there and 'nothing to worry about' rather than needing it in an emergency because you wanted to wait and see. also if you labour too fast to actually make it to the hospital and into surgery, and your boy is breech, you risk him coming out with one foot, other up and potentially 'get stuck' or break his hips (not saying it WILL happen but its a real risk)
also like being able to say to people (spesh family) "this is when its happening. we want this long. you can come at this time" and knowing that DP could book the time off work ahead so the he was 100% there and not late arriving because of traffic or is he couldnt be reached etc.
my MW is a trained nurse and is confident anough with breech babies... but advised against it (especially in my case with him as a footling breech). we had a water birth planned and was wanting to be home within a few hours. she had a huge range of suggestions because she prefers to try everything before 'cut it out' becomes an option.
alost just re-read your questions ...
When you plan an ECV, they make sure that there is a minimum of 1 OR free incase something goes wrong, they have you hooked up to the external feotal monitor and as I am A- blood type, i got an injection of Anti D afterwards JIC.
also while the ECV hurt, it was more like when someone gives you a back massage and they are rough iygwim? but none of mine worked because of the position of my placenta changed the shape of my uterus - went from being an inverted triangle to a rectangle so he had no where to go lol. but he didnt even move half an inch. stubborn little man!
feel free to PM me... but my suggestion is unequivocally to plan an elective CS. (more relaxed and you can make sure the people you want to be there are there)
|
Posted By: fire_engine
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 1:39pm
freckle wrote:
You sound like you trust your MW and therefore, I would be inclined to listen to her and take her advice - she is the medical professional and has much more experience with birth than any of us ... I would just try and focus on doing what you can to facilitate baby turning and try not to stress too much at this stage... |
Fair point Freckle, and remember those of us who are pro #2 haven't birthed breech babies (I'm pretty sure)
------------- Mum to two wee boys
|
Posted By: HippyMama
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 1:59pm
I thought I'd dig out my copy of Breech Birth, Woman-Wise and throw a few excerpts out there as I follow this discussion, and hopefully some of it will be helpful.
Maggie Banks wrote:
p. 21
There have been no prospective trials large enough to demonstrate any excess perinatal mortality risk for breech babies when a trial of vaginal delivery is attempted. The excess risk of 1:300 is therefore a calculation being noted as statistically nonsignificant.
|
There is also a very useful, albeit large section on exercises and other remedies that may be helpful in turning a breech baby, including the use of pulsatilla, hypnosis, acupuncture and chiropractic manipulation.
This is a snippet of what she has to say on the ECV maneuver:
Maggie Banks wrote:
p. 43
Prior to attempting to turn the baby:
* The woman should be thoroughly happy with the procedure being attempted. Relaxation is essential to the success of the ECV.
* The midwife needs to have excluded that the placenta is low lying.
* The woman's abdomen should be palpated to ensure that the baby is still breech, to assess engagement liquor volume and uterine tightenings.
* If there is any doubt as to the baby's presentation still being breech a second opinion or ultrasound scan should be sought.
p. 46
If all attempts to encourage the breech baby into a cephalic presentation have been unsuccessful, there needs to be a point where one accepts that the baby's intention is to remain in a breech presentation. Each woman will reach her own end point for deciding when that point is."
|
I also found this section quite poignant given your comment on your mum's tendency to become a bit panicky (even though it is written in the context of the woman-midwife relationship):
Maggie Banks wrote:
p. 54
Impact of fear on labour
Fear filled language can be used which has a powerful impact on birth by increasing anxiety for both the woman an the birth attendant.
... and ...
Kassel surveyed twenty one midwives who support women to give birth normally to their breech babies. Overwhelmingly these midwives saw breech birth not as high risk" but as requiring special and extra considerations. Most felt that it is the fear of breech birth in our socieities that posed any additional risk. This fear factor requires the mother to be more vigilant in her mental preparation.
|
There is also an excellent section (easy to read / well written) on the technical aspects of when a woman is actually in labour with a breech baby, with bits that are helpful for both the woman and the midwife - if there is anything in that particular area that you would like to know more about I can always re-read that chapter properly for you and pass the info on (ie: too many for me to choose from!).
Although, in talking to other women who have birthed breech babies, it is echoed in this book one very important thing to remember:
Maggie Banks wrote:
p. 82
As with any birth there should be no touching of the baby as the woman gives birth unless absolutely necessary. The old midwifery adage hands off the breech unless there is a complication should be constantly playing in the midwife's mind until the nape of the neck is seen.
|
And last but not least, on caring for a breech-birthed bubba immediately after 'exit'
Maggie Banks wrote:
p. 85
Should supportive measures be needed this can be done with the baby in the mother's arms requiring no separation from her unless the baby requires extensive resuscitation. The mother plays a vital role in "calling her baby in" telling him how please she is to see himand how beautiful he is. It will be an instinctive action for her not to take her eyes off the baby. In the meanwhile the baby has the continued support with the cord still intact, beating and providing oxygenation. If it has stopped beating it may restart later. The baby will be kept warm next to his mother and if necessary hot water bottles can be used.
|
I do apologise as I know this will be a lot of information to absorb, and I'm not trying to judge you or tell you what to do at all, but I just wanted to put the information out there as it was something I too had concerns over with DD2 and ended up extensively researching and discussing with my midwife.
------------- Mama to two earth walkers & two angels.
Remember, you are not managing an inconvenience; You are raising a human being. ~ Kittie Franz
Next Slingbabies! Meet - Friday 4th May !!
|
Posted By: Shezamumof3
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 2:05pm
I would probably go with option one, an elective is so much easier to recover from than an emergency Section(from experience).
I myself wouldnt not feel comfortable trying to birth a breech baby, especially if I had the history of fast hrd labours.
BF will be totally fine! My milk came in on day 3 both times and you will still be able to feed both girls, just gotta make sure C doesnt lean on your CS scar.
But definitely dont stress at this stage, Caden was breech at 35 weeks and he turned I felt it!!!!! Just do all you can to get her to turn, scrub the floor, crawl around, swim!!!
*hugs*
-------------
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 2:40pm
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 2:42pm
Oh and just thought I'd add, it's cool that so many breech bubs have turned at the last minute.. ..but that's the crux of my problem....they're not gonna 'let' me go that long unless I put my foot down and say Lets See What Happens.....otherwise they'll book me in for a section about 38 weeks cos of my labour history. 
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: fire_engine
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 2:45pm
Damned crystal ball, where did I leave it.
Sorry EC - rock | hard place? When's the latest you can make up your mind? Can you say to your MW at 37 weeks, yes, I've decided I will have a CS or do they want you to commit. Given the # that seem to turn late, I'd be tempted to leave committing for as long as possible.
------------- Mum to two wee boys
|
Posted By: weegee
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 2:58pm
You CAN put your foot down and say you don't want a c section until 40 weeks though - nobody can MAKE you do anything you don't want to do.
As an aside, there's a school of thought amongst natural practitioners that a breech baby can be a symptom of some sort of indecision on the part of the mother, for whatever reason. I felt really offended when I read that while my baby was breech, lol, but I do get it in a way. When it turned out that Addie was breech and the option for a VBAC might be taken away from me, I was so gutted I realised how much I really did want to push bubba out and it really strengthened my resolve. So who knows, maybe it was just totally making up my mind that I did want a VBAC that made her turn. The mind-body connection is a mysterious thing!
Anyway, that's part of the reason homeopaths might suggest pulsatilla, and a lot will suggest a session of hypnotherapy or similar to calm the mother and work through any issues that you might be feeling trepidatious about (juggling two kids/tandem feeding/the labour process itself... BTDT!). Just something you might like to consider, feel free to ignore me if you think it doesn't apply to you 
-------------
Mum to JJ, 4 July 2008 & Addie, 28 July 2010
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 4:12pm
Posted By: snugglebug
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 4:19pm
Being a first time Mum I don't have any advice but just wanted to say I'm really sorry you're going through this as I know how tough it will be on you to have to make this decision, with neither option being one you would want and it going against what you believe in. But I think you should try all you can and then make the decision later on when you have to, it will make you feel better to be trying everything possible first and know that if it does come to a c-section, you've done all you could. The safety of you and baby is the most important thing, but I understand your reluctance. While I'm not facing a c-section as of yet, I am terrified of having one because I already had one abdominal surgery with my appendix out this year! But you're a strong woman and whatever you have to do, I know you will cope really well and not let it get the better of you. Sorry that doesn't help much but just wanted to say thinking of you and always around for a chat x
------------- Me 28, DH 29 DS born 20 Nov 2010 (4 years old) #2 due October 7 http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Bizzy
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 5:21pm
i can help on a few of these things with regards to info.
I had an ECV with toby - he was transverse. Actually it took 2 to get him right. lol!
And it didnt hurt... he was my 2nd child as this is for you and the guy who did the turning said that definitely goes in your favour. They did a scan before hand to check his position and monitoring after as well.
also my last pregnancy was a c section and i had the 2 kids at home to look after. i didnt have any trouble bonding with eden, we did have troubles with bf but i think that would have happened anyway and once we got it sorted she hasnt stopped - evidenced by me feeding her at 2.5! i think the benefits of having a planned c section - whether it be booked in or not - is that you can discuss ahead of time with your mw about skin to skin and what you what done with bub until you get to recovery. i think i healed quite well and was able to use the sling for carrying eden quite quickly and didnt have many problems looking after them all.
i dont know if you have looked at the spinning babies website, i found that had some interesting and helpful info when eden was transverse too. (how bad is that 2 kids lying sideways, no wonder my body looks this shape haha!) Also i have heard of a link between your diet (specifically sugar) and breech babies...? there are some people who claim diet can help turn bubs.
Oh and to answer your original question what would I do... I would go for option 2 but i wouldnt make any decisions until i had had a scan.
------------- http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker">
|
Posted By: amme_eilyk
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 6:01pm
which plan would make you feel the most calm and relaxed leading up to the birth? That is the one I would go for.
|
Posted By: flakesitchyfeet
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 6:13pm
Ditto. If you like to be organised, maybe go for the planned? DS was breech for so flippin long it really started affecting my mental state. I'd get my head around a natural birth at a centre, before having to adjust to a ceaser, before a last minute ecv saved the day and I ended up having a vaginal birth at the main hospital - but I hated not being organised or knowing where I was going or what was happening.
The other thing to consider I guess, is how each situation could end up. With DD the birth went so awfully wrong and by the end of it in such a mess I didn't want skin to skin, made the hubby do it, and it took me alot longer to bond. This time with DS, my midwife was aware of what happened last time, and stepped in with the epi and the perfect time - it was such an awesome experience being 'with it' enough to really enjoy the new arrival.
Just what I'd do entirely - I don't envy you right now!
------------- http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com"> http://eggsineachbasket.blogspot.com/
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 6:39pm
Posted By: _SMS_
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 7:57pm
I would be inclined to go with elective c section, if you need to have one. Especially when you listed all the things that could go wrong, with your DF not getting there etc during the day.
I hate the idea of an ECV, i refused to have one when Taylah was breech. The whole idea just scared the Sh*t out of me
But i think Acupuncture or Moxi sticks will work and you wont have to worry at all
-------------

|
Posted By: Red
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:25pm
I would go with option two - because I would always be thinking "what if". And cos I have a real phobia of having a c-section.
------------- http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Emmi_
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:28pm
Personally I would go with plan 2... I do not want another c section again unless I have to. I would def try everything else first before booking in the c section, even if you just book it in for 40w (but wait and see how big she is, I hope you dont have a Lilla hiding in there!)
Have you tried visualising bubs turning? Try talking to her and coaxing her to turn, and relax your body and mind and visualise her up the wrong way and see her turn, imagine what it would feel like etc. It might just help (if it doesnt sound too hippyish!)
-------------
+1 May 09 Angel
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 8:44pm
Posted By: Lulu
Date Posted: 14 October 2010 at 9:22pm
My DD was breech, head and legs right up, bum right down. Elective c-section was what my specialist recommended and I trusted that decision as being the best for the wellbeing of me and my baby. The elective was calm, straight forward and the recovery was extremely fast. There was no trouble with milk supply.
------------- Lou
http://www.babysfirstsite.com">
|
Posted By: lisa85
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 10:11am
Personally I would book the c/section :) I'm a planner too and I like to have control. I had an elective when my presenting twin Esme was breech and it all went exactly to plan. I didn't like the idea of going into labour knowing it could go either way because she was breech so I just went with the option I felt I had more control with which was the c/section The whole process was very calm and organised and that appealled to me.
------------- http://lilypie.com">
TTC #3 since Jan 2010 - PCOS
MC April 2010
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 2:36pm
Well I've told a few friends but don't wanna jinx it....I used my doppler last night adn found the HB nice and strong on my lower left hand side (it was up by my right rib the day before)...so I'm HOPING that the business yesterday meant a turn of some kind! 
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Nutella
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 4:52pm
That's good news. hopefully baby will carry on getting into the right position.
Why are you worried about the breastfeeding side of things with c sect...seems to me that lots of us c sect people have managed to breastfeed successfully and since you have done so with one bubs then chances are things will go well. Get that out of your head!! (Plus you prob won't even need to worry since baby is turning right...)
-------------
Oct 11
|
Posted By: cuppatea
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 6:37pm
Oh hope she has turned that would be awesome.
To answer original question if it were me and she was bum engaged I would try natural, otherwise I would book in for 39ish weeks, maybe earlier if you labour is superfast cos I think footling breach can be quite dangerous cos of cord prolapse etc.
I don't think I would try the ECV.
There are advantages to booking in with an elective if you think you are gonna have a c/s anyway, the only bit I didn't really like was that the hospital choose the birth date rather than nature, but it's not that big a deal really.
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 7:23pm
Posted By: HippyMama
Date Posted: 15 October 2010 at 10:56pm
I had to go away and dig this up, but thought you might like to have a read of this link to an article about umbilical cords around babies' necks at birth:
http://vbacfacts.com/2009/09/16/umbilical-cord-around-babys-neck-rarely-causes-complications/ - http://vbacfacts.com/2009/09/16/umbilical-cord-around-babys-neck-rarely-causes-complications/
------------- Mama to two earth walkers & two angels.
Remember, you are not managing an inconvenience; You are raising a human being. ~ Kittie Franz
Next Slingbabies! Meet - Friday 4th May !!
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 8:12am
Thanks for the link HippyMama 
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: Vanillabean
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 9:29am
Hi Emmecat
I had an emergency c-section and had major breastfeeding problems (low milk supply that would not increase significantly no matter what I did). I researched the issue a lot and am comfortable that my problems were not related to the c-section. I came across a heap of people who had c-sections who breastfed just fine. The major issue seems to be milk coming in later than with a vag birth which means you might need to supplement and pump for first few days but the longest it would take is 2 weeks and usually much quicker.
Also, I was really gutted that BF didn't work out but it has also been a huge learning experience for me and I came through it and am now I really happy mama with a really happy baby. You can have a beautiful loving bond with your baby without BF.
Also, I didn't find the c-section difficult to recover from physically. I didn't feel any more physically debilitated than I did when I was 9 months pregnant e.g. turning over in bed tricky but manageable. For me I was in emotional pain because I really wanted a VB. I have heard that elective c-section mums have better mental health outcomes because they are emotionally prepared for the method of delivery.
Good luck with getting that baby turned!
------------- 5x mc, Jan 08, June 08, Nov 08, May 09, April 11
http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 5:55pm
Posted By: cuppatea
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 7:05pm
Emmecat I had huge oversupply issues even after my c/s. I had been dripping colostrum for weeks before my c/s and afterwards they said I had enough to feed the whole ward. We did have problems feeding and I weaned at 3 months but that was due to repeated infections and other problems (and I expect his allergies were a cause of the rest of the problems, but we didn't know he had any at the time), I don't think any of it was due to the c/s and it certainly wasn't due to a lack of milk, if anything it was having too much that caused most of my problems.
Plus you also have the advantage of still feeding another child and being an old hand at this whole feeding business. Your milk will take longer to come in, I had baby on the monday and no milk till friday, but he had loads of colostrum and was ok on just that until he got the milk, so don't panic about feeding.
|
Posted By: newme
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 7:18pm
If you are feeding an older child, then slowly your milk will change to become more colostrom the closer you get to the birth, then you will have colostrom and generally milk comes in again pretty quickly. I can't imagine that you will have any problems whatsoever with supply as you already have a good milk supply.
You should have a chat with your local La Leche League group. They are really helpful with breastfeeding issues.
Often older children will self-wean when you have a second child as they don't like the taste of colostrom.
|
Posted By: Emmi_
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 9:15pm
I was wondering how BFing works when you have a brand new newborn, like with the colostrum and stuff.
I wouldnt think you would have any issues with BFing EC, you have milk already so dont see a c section drying it up... (I would love some info on this if anyone has any good links? sorry to thread jack!)
ooohh I just hope shes turned for you and stays there! Be a good girl for your mamma!!
-------------
+1 May 09 Angel
|
Posted By: Nutella
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 9:55pm
Yeah, I guess if you have heard of others having problems it can make you anxious, but I reckon it will be fine. I don't remember it taking a long time for my milk to come in, had DS on the Monday and was home on the Thursday and had established feeding by then...the only trouble I had was silly old flat nipples. I had LOADS of milk as well lol...
Also, I found the c sect pretty easy to recover from despite it being a super emergency one (plancental abruption)...but that sounds like it is just the luck of the draw sometimes. Some people have an easy time and some don't!
-------------
Oct 11
|
Posted By: Emmi_
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 10:00pm
My milk took over 10 days to come in, started to come in at 10 days but still took another 4ish days of expressing to be producing enough.
Also ended up with 2 infections, spent the first week in hosp (went home when DD was 7 days old) and then was back in hosp for her 3rd week (day 16 to 22)... Both were infections from having a c section and then being in hosp, wouldnt have got them if I had had a VB or let the Drs try to work out what was wrong the first time. Totally not the way I want to do things next time. However as my MW said, I was very unlucky to have so many things go wrong.. so its prob not the standard, however its the only experience I have...
Anyway, bubs is going to turn and stay turned so you wont have to worry about it
-------------
+1 May 09 Angel
|
Posted By: Nutella
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 10:12pm
Urgh poor you, not the greatest way to start being a mum. i ended up back in hospital with mastitis and an abcess when DS was about 8 weeks old. I wonder if I would have had if my body had not had to recover from c sect...hadn't thought about that til now.....
-------------
Oct 11
|
Posted By: Emmi_
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 10:14pm
Hehe I have mastitis too (luckily managed to avoid hospital though!) which has led to our on going feeding issues, but thats another chapter!!
-------------
+1 May 09 Angel
|
Posted By: Nutella
Date Posted: 16 October 2010 at 10:24pm
The joy of breastfeeding...haha! Wait til the teeth come...waaa! DS is just lucky he has such a cute face.
-------------
Oct 11
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 17 October 2010 at 7:51am
Posted By: weegee
Date Posted: 17 October 2010 at 9:05am
When Addie turned it was really hard to tell what was where because she left this big pocket of liquor where her head had been, so belly mapping wasn't as useful then. Fingers crossed your little monkey is indeed head down (and stays that way!).
FYI though, it took a week for my milk to come in after my c-section with JJ (Emmi I had a wound infection) but my milk came in pretty much instantaneously with Addie. Yes there was the difference that Addie was a VB, but it usually takes a couple of days for your milk to come in, so I'm guessing if you were still feeding a toddler and had a c section it would take less time for your milk to come in than if you hadn't been feeding iygwim (maybe a couple of days).
hila1 my toddler seemed to really love the taste of colostrum Emmi there's a whole section on kellymom devoted to tandem feeding which explains how it all works if you're interested 
-------------
Mum to JJ, 4 July 2008 & Addie, 28 July 2010
|
Posted By: Emmecat
Date Posted: 17 October 2010 at 1:55pm
Yeah I am thinking CLodagh is gonna like the taste of colostrum lol...she certainly hasn't shown any sign or inclination of wanting to self wean throughout the pg, even when I"m sure I didn't have much milk! Now I think I have some more coming in, she is one happy camper lol.
-------------
  http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
|
Posted By: monkey33
Date Posted: 17 October 2010 at 8:25pm
DS was breech my entire pregnancy - I went in for an ECV but I didn't have enough fluid so they did not want to risk trying it. I then was waiting to hear back from AKL hospital for my c-section date when DS decided it was time to come! (2 weeks early). I went into early labour and I was 3cm dilated. I was sent for a scan when I got to the hospital to make sure he hadn't decided to turn and he was still breech so I was whisked away for a c-section.
I have heard of heaps of stories of babies turning in labour though - fingers crossed you don't need to make the decision
------------- http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: monkey33
Date Posted: 17 October 2010 at 8:34pm
Oh and just about the c-section itself - I had the best birth experience I could possibly ask for. (I didn't have a VBAC to compare it to though!). Because I went into early labour, we had the excited - oohh it's time! (But I would have been just as happy with going in on a planned date) and the c-section went so well. The atmosphere was excitement from us aswell as a feeling of calm. Recovery wise, I was driving after 2 & half weeks. Before that, it was a little tricky but nothing I couldn't manage. DH hung the washing out & did the vaccumming for a few weeks. The only really tough thing for me was getting out of bed sometimes (it was easier to kind of roll out)- a rope tied to the end of the bed to pull up would have been fantastic!!!
------------- http://lilypie.com"> http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Vanillabean
Date Posted: 18 October 2010 at 9:25am
Breastfeeding was really important to me too and to be honest I was devastated when it didn't work out. But like any kind of loss, you grieve it and you heal and move on.
Anyway, it really doesn't sound likely to me that having a c-section would cause you major BF problems. Once again, I am a weird anomaly with this And as I said, I think it would have happened even if I had had a VB.
Hope that baby stays put head down!
------------- 5x mc, Jan 08, June 08, Nov 08, May 09, April 11
http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: luckystar
Date Posted: 18 October 2010 at 12:46pm
Emme - I reckon your little lady has turned for you But IF not, I agree with your plan to book in the elective ceaser (as late as possible). I think Clodough still BFing will mean you avoid any problems with milk supply etc, so I definitely wouldn't worry about that. IMO the worst thing would be for your DF to miss DDs arrival just because you were waiting to see what happened on the day... from experience, being faced with needing an emergency c sctn, can be a really distressing, emotional and hormonal time, so you're better to plan for one and come to terms with it in advance, if it's looking to be the likely outcome anyway IYKWIM.
And can I also say, it is SO GREAT to read all the positive stories of people's c-section experiences on this thread. I had a rough time dealing with DDs chaotic arrival, and have a planned c-section to deliver my son in just a few weeks now. Some of the stories on here have really strengthened my hope that DS's arrival will be a calmer and happier time for me 
------------- http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow"> 
|
|