What do you think?
Printed From: OHbaby!
Category: General Chat
Forum Name: General Chat
Forum Description: For mums, dads, parents-to-be, grandparents, friends -- you name it! And you name the topic you want to chat about!
URL: https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=6195
Printed Date: 10 October 2025 at 10:38pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Topic: What do you think?
Posted By: Maya
Subject: What do you think?
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 8:57am
|
We've had a few members asking for a restricted photo gallery - a place where we can post pictures of our little ones and they are only visible to registered members.
What do you think? If we had a restricted photo board would you use it, or would you prefer to post your pics on the general public boards? -------------  Maya Grace (28/02/03)
 (02/01/06)
The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
|
Replies:
Posted By: ellabellame
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:20am
|
i think i'd rather use a restricted board than post photos for everyone to see (as it's been pointed out, mikey is often without clothes).
i think i trust all the members enough to not drool over my wee boy's body  ------------- |
Posted By: 11111
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:23am
|
I would rather a resrticted board that way not jsut anyone can look at or use the pic's posted. ------------- Deborah Mum to:   
|
Posted By: Paws
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:37am
|
I'd rather use restricted. ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
|
Posted By: EllenMumof2
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:44am
|
i think restricted would be good http://pregnancy.baby-gaga.com/">
 http://lilypie.com">
  http://lilypie.com">   |
Posted By: Bizzy
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:51am
you know where i stand on this... ------------- http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker"> 
|
Posted By: yummymummy
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 10:05am
|
I'd rather use restricted too - I'm a bit nervous posting pics at the mo ------------- http://lilypie.com">  http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Bombshell
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 10:08am
|
LOL i had this dilemma this morning when i posted the in the bath photo...only one had her covered up and that was the lovely screaming one...
I think keep being able to post photos in threads but also have restricted...for various reasons (and not just for Mikey the nudie rudie!!!) another reason for this...I would then post photos with me in them more...i dont do currently as anyone can access them...and i would guess other mums are the same?? i would love to know what other members look like and apart from our meet and greet photos we dont often see one anothers photos... |
Posted By: ellabellame
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 10:20am
lol, mikey the nudie rudie *cringe*
------------- |
Posted By: lizzle
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 10:29am
| never really thought about it in all hoensty so either for me - but restircted is probably a good idea. |
Posted By: mum2emj
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 12:38pm
restricted would be great 
|
Posted By: Bubbaloo
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 2:06pm
|
I like the idea of there being are restricted board. ------------- http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">  Was danni-chick Mum to James My Angel 28/07/08 |
Posted By: kebakat
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 2:42pm
| I don't see the point personally. It's a good idea but if some random person really wants to see the photos all they have to do is quickly join up |
Posted By: my2angels
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 2:44pm
| I like the idea of restricted but as Stacey pointed out they only have to join up. Is there any way it could also be monitored? |
Posted By: busymum
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 3:25pm
|
Only to members with a certain level of posting? Although I wouldn't draw it as far along as "seniors".
I personally don't care whether photos are restricted or not because I would be just as careful either way but.... I would prefer restricted for birth notices (full names). ------------- |
Posted By: Paws
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 8:22pm
|
You could have a restricted section and you need a 50 post minimum to access. Several of us know of another forum that does this and honestly it's a great idea...there is a lot I don't post here as there is no restricted section. ------------- http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Bombshell
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 8:41pm
| yeah a number like 50 or 100 would be ideal...means someone would really have to post to get to that point...and hey if they do that then they will do anything so nothing will stop photos being pinched / used etc... |
Posted By: daikini
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 8:55pm
I haven't really thought about it, but a restricted one with a post minimum to enter makes sense. I know Nat prefers I don't put pictures of him on here without his knowledge  ------------- Becca, mum of 2 girls & 3 boys |
Posted By: Kellz
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:02pm
| Yep I think its a good idea too |
Posted By: 11111
Date Posted: 17 March 2007 at 9:35pm
|
I like the restricted post idea that we we really get to know the people ------------- Deborah Mum to:
|
Posted By: Brenna
Date Posted: 18 March 2007 at 11:24am
|
I think it is a great idea. I know that I'm not too keen of posting pics of me (and DH def doesn't want anything of him on here). I would like to get to know other people better so think it's a good thing to do. I also agree there should be a minimum posts thing... ------------- My beautiful 2 girls...nearly 4 and 13 months
|
Posted By: jax
Date Posted: 18 March 2007 at 2:40pm
|
I agree with the idea, as you already know.
I think you become a Senior Member when you hit 100 posts here anyway? ------------- Jacquie - Mama to Erin, 13.07.06 - Chief Cat Chaser & Marmite Sammie Eater 
Love many, trust few, harm none. ~Anon~ |
Posted By: Bizzy
Date Posted: 18 March 2007 at 7:24pm
|
i agree too that you should have a certain number of posts before you can access restricted areas... so for most of us on here already we would already be eligible so hopefully it wouldnt take too much to do it then new people would have to wait... ------------- http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker">
|
Posted By: Two Blondinis
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 1:41pm
|
This is just MY opinion as there is obviously some background to this that I am unaware of, but... If we choose to put piccies on a "public forum" then we choose what we put out there in the public.
Even with this "100 posts gets you into restricted areas" thing, I really don't see that working to stop the types of people how are going to missuse this right to access areas. I know it's nice to share pics of our kiddies but I always think before I post (i.e. the nuddie rudie ones) as this is a website that is just as open to hackers/lurkers as the photo storing ones. ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
 
|
Posted By: Roksana
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 3:42pm
|
Yap I agree with others restricted Photo place would be good and yah some one with atleast 100 post to get in to see the pics!!
Oh and Ella...I am the only one that keeps pointing out that Mikey is with out his outawear...LOL.  ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
http://lilypie.com"> 
|
Posted By: Paws
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 5:33pm
|
The whole thing is that if you have a restricted area or an area where you need approved access to then it's a lot more work for people to see the photos who you don't want seeing the photos. (did that make sense!?) Yeah if people are determined enough they could still access but at least it is a measure of saftey. ------------- http://lilypie.com">
|
Posted By: Kels
Date Posted: 19 March 2007 at 8:56pm
|
I agree with the whole 100 post plus before access ------------- http://lilypie.com"> 
Busy mum to Miss 15yrs, Miss 10yrs and Master 4yrs |