Print Page | Close Window

Hot Milk = Soft Porn WTF!!!!

Printed From: OHbaby!
Category: General Chat
Forum Name: General Chat
Forum Description: For mums, dads, parents-to-be, grandparents, friends -- you name it! And you name the topic you want to chat about!
URL: https://www.ohbaby.co.nz/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=9174
Printed Date: 23 September 2026 at 6:14am
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Hot Milk = Soft Porn WTF!!!!
Posted By: peanut butter
Subject: Hot Milk = Soft Porn WTF!!!!
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 3:05pm
Did anyone read in the sunday star times about people complaining about the hot milk ads being soft porn for feature pregnant women!!!!

Maybe the association is that pregnant women MUST have had sex!???!!??? (unless it was IVF of course )

When I first saw the ads I thought it was so cool thatthere could be sexy lingerie (not undies) for pregnant women.

I ordered a set myself and when I put them on I felt like a woman again!!!! It was an amazing feelilng and I think it is so wrong for the politically correct to take that away from us!!!

What do you think??

Heres the http://www.stuff.co.nz//4128734a11.html - article online



Replies:
Posted By: Bombshell
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 3:07pm
are the ads on tv or were the complaints about the press / mag type ones??

ah ya gotta be kidding what kinda idiots would complain about that....nah dont worry I know a few like that!!!


Posted By: Chovynz
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 3:12pm
I think thats a beautiful pic. It's not soft porn at all. And believe me, most guys wouldn't think of that as soft porn either.

Overley sensitive complainants I'd say.

-------------
Defending the male species since 1980


Posted By: james
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 3:28pm
must be people with no lifes some poeple are sooo sad

-------------
<a href="http://lilypie.com"><img src="http://b4.lilypie.com/nLJ5p13.png" alt="Lilypie 4th Birthday Ticker" border="0" /></a>


Posted By: caliandjack
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 3:53pm
some people are a bit weird when it comes to pregnant bodies, personally I think pregnancy is when a woman is at her most beautiful.

-------------
http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
[/url]

Angel June 2012


Posted By: busymum
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 4:09pm
Weird! I'm glad for that kind of product... I just wish it was cheaper but that's okay

-------------


Posted By: Mazzy
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 4:24pm
How odd! And really, lingerie is supposed to be sexy, isn't it? I've seen those ads and think they are great! Bring on the sexy mamas!


Posted By: Lissy
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 4:25pm

Originally posted by busymum busymum wrote:

Weird! I'm glad for that kind of product... I just wish it was cheaper but that's okay

Agreed .  I wish it was cheaper.  Don't believe it is soft porn at all.  DH said "whatever"!



-------------
Harlan Drew DOB: 06.12.06 & Stepmum to Ethan & Christian, DOB: 25.02.99


Posted By: peanut butter
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 5:05pm
hehehe and if it was soft porn....what so bad about that these days...we deserve it

I just hope it is good publicity for Hot Milk and for Frances from breastmates. If it opens our eyes to the product...all the better.


Posted By: Paws
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 5:55pm
Originally posted by Bombshell Bombshell wrote:

are the ads on tv or were the complaints about the press / mag type ones??


Fran was complained to personally by a moderator of another forum when she recived the pics in an email....the whole thing is stupid!!!

i don't think they look like soft core porn.

-------------
http://lilypie.com">


Posted By: Bubbaloo
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 6:17pm
I don't think it's soft porn at all it is exactly the same sort of photo you would see in a Farmers, Kmart etc advertising.

-------------
http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">



Was danni-chick



Mum to James

My Angel 28/07/08


Posted By: peanut butter
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 6:43pm
I think the comlaints mightbe because it actually looks nice and not just practical.


Posted By: arohanui
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 7:25pm
Originally posted by Danni-chick Danni-chick wrote:

I don't think it's soft porn at all it is exactly the same sort of photo you would see in a Farmers, Kmart etc advertising.


Exactly. Looks like a normal photo advertising underwear to me, except for the fact that the belly is bigger

-------------
Mama to DS1 (5 years), DS2 (3 years) and...
http://alterna-tickers.com" rel="nofollow">


Posted By: Leelee
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 8:36pm
I think that is ridiculous, a womans pregnant body is a beautiful thing, some people need to get a life


Posted By: busymum
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 8:47pm
Haha if I was pg and wore that stuff and people (hopefully only one would see though LOL) thought I looked like "soft porn".... I'd be pretty flattered ROFL!!!!

-------------


Posted By: Maya
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 8:58pm
I don't get how it's any different to any other lingerie ad? Some people have too much time on their hands...

-------------
Maya Grace (28/02/03)
(02/01/06)
The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)


Posted By: mummy_becks
Date Posted: 15 July 2007 at 9:20pm
Peole seriously have too much time to complain about things like this. They woman in the ads look great and apart form a preggy belly its pretty much the same as any other ad. And I too wish I could afford it.

-------------
I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!


Posted By: nuttymama
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 6:54am
Why is it they can show on TV a woman dancing around in front of her man showing him different lingerie in the changing rooms and then showing him paying for it. But yet a woman who is pregnant in lingerie is soft porn wtf.

-------------
Abigail 06/01/2005
Jayden   21/11/2001
Micheal 03/04/1997


Posted By: Bombshell
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 1:24pm
Dh just rang me to tell me it was being discussed on newstalk ZB...so i rang in....I said as a new mum it was nice to be sexy for me, hubby and to contain them at the same time....go hot milk!!! I think it is an awesome concept and have no problem with the name,....unlike the idiot before me who gave mothers a bad name!!!

I think this has been wonderfl publicity for a NZ business - not all positive given but good publicity all the same!!! Heres hoping she gets loads of business out of all of this!!!


Posted By: peanut butter
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 1:27pm
I'm with you on that BS. Thats partly why I posted here so we would all talk about it and counteract the "negative" publicity. Mind you I think the only people who are being negative would never have bought it in the first place and for everyone else hopefully they will go "oooo thats nice. I want I want I want!!"

I want another but I dont know what my boobs are going to do between now and then. So far they have only gone up 1 size over the whole pregnancy....1 size more and hot milk is out for me


Posted By: Bombshell
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 1:30pm
LOL i think i need a few more WW weeks before i can fit hot milk...altho that may just be incentive enough for me....

the woman ahead of me on newstalk said how the problem was the name "hot milk" - get a life!!! that is beigng overly precious i think....i thought it was a very clever name acually...and nothing about those ads are porn...damn the news having to go on or i would have kept on my little rant on the radio....


Posted By: peanut butter
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 1:40pm
good for you! I would never have the guts to speak up.


Posted By: nikkitheknitter
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 2:03pm
I've seen worse on music videos (much worse actually... I'm a little appalled. Geez, I must be getting old!)

Soft porn... they can kiss my ass.


Posted By: caliandjack
Date Posted: 16 July 2007 at 2:20pm
maybe its slow news week, and theres nothing better to complain about. I hope the woman who sells them is getting loads of publicity out of it.

The women modelling them are georgous, shame they don't come in larger sizes or are a little more affordable.

Still nothing like squeezing oneself into sexy black lingere to perk up your day.

-------------
http://lilypie.com" rel="nofollow">
[/url]

Angel June 2012


Posted By: Andie
Date Posted: 17 July 2007 at 4:20pm

How crazy to think that that ad is porn!  The only thing wrong with that photo is that the model's head is missing, her belly could be bigger and she could be in a slightly sexier pose, and wearing one of their nicer ranges!  Soft porn, my butt. 

actually that's a phrase that could be taken the wrong way.    



-------------
Andie


Posted By: busymum
Date Posted: 17 July 2007 at 6:58pm
Originally posted by andie andie wrote:

Soft porn, my butt.

actually that's a phrase that could be taken the wrong way.     


Haha that's what I was thinking about Nikki's post (she basically said the same thing)

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net