New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Low Lying Placenta
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedLow Lying Placenta

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Low Lying Placenta
    Posted: 18 October 2010 at 8:59am
hey ya,

at my 20w scan on friday they expressed a wee bit of concern about the placenta lying right next to the cervix.. has anyone had this before and had it shift away as the baby grows or is it something i should be concerned about or anything i can do to try and prevent it moving across my cervix?

thanks, little bit worried!! i did ask my midwife she said it may shift but they will check again at 32 weeks..




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Plushie View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Points: 3796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Plushie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 9:09am
Hey love!

I had the same thing said at my scan, and my midwife said the same thing - a scan at 32 weeks to double check.

I think the theory is, as you get bigger and the uterus expands upwards it also pulls the placenta up and away at the same time.

I don't have any advice - just letting you know i'm in the same boat, and lurking along to see what responses you get.
Back to Top
Babykatnz View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 April 2008
Location: Papatoetoe
Points: 5554
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Babykatnz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 9:20am
Mine was sitting right against cervix at 18w5d scan, f/up scan 2 weeks later showed it had already moved clear of cervix. (with Jae obviously since I havent had anatomy scan for this one yet )

As Bowie said, when the uterus expands upwards, the placenta goes with it I think something like 80-90% of 'low-lying' placentas noted at anatomy scans have moved clear of cervix by the time a repeat scan is done.
Brandon - 05/12/2003


Back to Top
MrsMojo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 18 March 2008
Location: Wellington
Points: 8202
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrsMojo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 9:26am

I had a low-lying placenta both pregnancies (both times it was within 1cm of the exit) but both times it had moved by 32 weeks and I went on to have a natural aneasthesia-free VB.

An estimated 20-30% of pregnancies have a low lying placenta in the second trimester but by full term the vast majority have moved into the upper segment of the uterus and only about 1% of full-term pregnancies has placenta praevia.

Back to Top
kebakat View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy North
Points: 10980
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kebakat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 9:56am
Theres been a few threads on this in the past with lots of girls (myself included) who have had low lying placentas that have moved later on
Back to Top
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 10:01am
oh thanks ladies sounds not as bad as i was thinking then, i did a search for some threads on this here and couldnt find any, must have not searched correctly will have another look too..

those percentages not too bad, am quite keen to have a natural birth!




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
Red View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: West Auckland
Points: 1452
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Red Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 11:03am
Mine was about 1cm away from cervix - needed to be 2cm at 19 weeks scan. At 28 weeks it hadn't moved and then at 32weeks it had so we were all good. MW said 90% of time they move up. Had to have internal scans later on in pregnancy as sonographer couldn't see with bubs head in way - but they were fine.
Back to Top
newme View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 11 January 2009
Location: Christchurch
Points: 703
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote newme Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 11:57am
I wouldn't worry about it. I had a low lying placenta and it was fine at the 32 week scan.
Back to Top
RedHeadDuck View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 20 May 2010
Points: 1092
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote RedHeadDuck Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 12:34pm
I had a low lying placenta and it moved up perfectly fine So not a problem in the end
Back to Top
KH25 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Cambridge
Points: 1972
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KH25 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18 October 2010 at 2:23pm
I had a complete placenta previa - the placenta was totally covering the cervix. Not many move when they are complete. I had 3 bleeds (very high risk of bleeding with PP) with the latest and biggest at 24 weeks. I was admitted on bedrest - probably for the remainder of my pregnancy - then I requested an internal scan just before 28 weeks. The abdo scans looked like it was still completely covering but the internal showed it was actually out of the way and above the babies head. I had another internal scan last week and they were able to measure this time - placenta was 2.4cm away and needs to be 2.5cm to attempt natural delivery so i should be fine by full term. Pretty amazing actually and sooooo glad I was able to come home!
Kelly, mum to DD, 19Jun06 (26wks 1lb15oz) DS1, 24Oct10 (32wks 4lb11oz) and DS2, 31Dec11 (32wks, 4lb11)
Back to Top
T_Rex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: PN
Points: 2896
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote T_Rex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 October 2010 at 1:14pm
That's useful info about the internal scan Kelly!

I had this at 20 weeks, and didn't worry about it, but it was still there at 32 weeks and the MW started talking C-section. If it got to that stage, I was planning to make them do another scan at the very last minute just in case, but it moved by 36 weeks.

There is nothing you can do about it though, just hope!

good luck
Back to Top
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2011 at 5:26pm
well i had my 32 week scan today and had an internal to get an accurate measurement, and its only 1.25cms from cervix.. considering the first measurement was 2.4 i'm not holding out too much hope of a natural birth now :(

anyone else with similar stories that either led to a planned csection or having it move enough for a natural birth?




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
Plushie View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Points: 3796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Plushie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2011 at 6:46pm
Honey, panic not!

Like i wrote above i had low lying at 20w scan, i went for a second scan at 35 weeks and it was still much too low and i was told to come back in two weeks, and by 37 weeks it was clear enough to attempt a VB

The OB told me at the 35 week scan that its incredibly unlikely that it would move enough but my midwife told me that they're worriers and not to stress - and she was right!

I DO have some limitations though, no homebirth obviously and i've been advised to head straight for the hospital, no hanging out at home during the early stages for me. I'll have to have a lure in my hand and blood matches lined up just in case and i'm aware that an emergency c-section is a real possibility. But me and my midwife are confident and she said i'm all ok to labour in the water etc so no being strapped to a bed or anything.

Will keep my fingers tightly crossed you have a similar good result

ETA: says in my notes that i have type 1 placenta previa which is the least serious of them all.

Edited by bowie
Back to Top
T_Rex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: PN
Points: 2896
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote T_Rex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12 January 2011 at 6:50pm
I've told you my story already, but my measurements were 2.3cm at 32 weeks and 7cm at 36weeks - which gave me the ok for a homebirth. So don't give up yet. Fingers crossed for you.
Back to Top
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 12:59pm
thanks girls,

i think the thing i'm alsot worried about (apart from not being able to attempt vaginal birth) is that it wont be moved enough for me to birth at waitakere (they need 5cms clearance) i desperately do not want to go to north shore i cant stand the place!

but holy moly t-rex thats a lot of movement in the last few weeks! i'll tell baby to make sure she keeps an elbow on it to shove it out the way,




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
LeeG View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 January 2009
Location: Wellington
Points: 477
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote LeeG Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 1:41pm
I'm the 1% that didn't have it move ... if you get to that stage let me know ... but as you've seen above chances are very slim. But in all honesty, complete bedrest from 33 weeks, and an emergency c-section are not that bad. Even Abi arriving 5 weeks early was ok ... I have a gorgeous baby girl, so nothing else matters!

And you have to be really unlucky for it not to move!

I just made sure that I was as organised as I could be at 32 weeks when I went for the second scan, so when I had a bleed at 33 weeks and was admitted to hospital I didnt' have to worry about things like the baby's room not being set up.

Let me know if you want to know anymore about it ... but in all honesty try not to worry, there is nothing you can do and they do normally move with all the stretching/growing thats happening
Back to Top
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 4:04pm
thanks for your story to LeeG, its good to know what all possible outcomes could be!

can i ask was your baby well engaged by 32 weeks? my midwife said something like because my baby is well engaged (her head is literally resting on my cervix for the last couple weeks) it means the placenta is out of the way enough for her head to get down there at least, so it might mean good things, but i'm not really so convinced about that, i just think she is trying to make me not fret :)

also, did you have any bleeds prior to you going into hospital? i have had four episodes of brown spotting which i attributed to the placenta as they couldnt find another cause, but it hasnt happened for about 5 weeks now..

sorry you dont have to answer those questions if you dont want to!




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
Plushie View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Points: 3796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Plushie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 4:25pm
I know you werent asking me but i hope you don't mind me butting in anyway - at 35 weeks my midwife said baby was partly engaged and if he'd managed to get his head down that far the placenta should move and at 37 weeks he was further engaged and the placenta was moved away. Basically the same as what your midwife said anyway, that if baby can get a head down there there isnt too much placenta in the way, maybe just a little corner that has heaps of time to move
Back to Top
Marengo View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 27 March 2010
Location: West Auckland
Points: 802
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Marengo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 6:17pm
ooh yay thats good news!




Our angel Ella Louise born 13.04.
Back to Top
T_Rex View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 07 March 2007
Location: PN
Points: 2896
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote T_Rex Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2011 at 8:22pm
They told me the same thing Marengo, about the head, and it was true for me

My measurement was 1.9cm at 20 weeks I think? So less than half a cm of movement from 20 to 32 weeks, and then a massive movement after that.

Also, I was told something like if it's less than 2cm, then it has to be a caesar, if it's more than 5cm it's considered normal, and in the 2-5cm range (which was me for a while) you have a chat with the OB who reviews the risks and your history etc and they make a decisions as to VB or caesar on a case by case basis.

I have my fingers crossed for you!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.314 seconds.