New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Risks with more than 1 implant
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedRisks with more than 1 implant

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
fionae View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 November 2008
Location: Gisborne, NZ
Points: 342
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fionae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Risks with more than 1 implant
    Posted: 13 January 2009 at 7:18pm
Hi all,
I was wondering if anyone knows what the big deal is with having more than one embryo put in.       Why do the specialists are so against it?
Is it more risky than conceiving twins naturally?

I have been told that sometimes if you are paying private they will do it but the risks are huge and not worth it.

I have heard conflicting reports...

Thanks for any info anyone has

Fiona

Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
tiptoes View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 November 2007
Points: 2490
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tiptoes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2009 at 10:42pm
Hi Fiona, here's the info on the fertility associates website that outlines the extra risks with twins. The table doesn't really copy and paste well so you might want to look on the website.

http://www.fertilityassociates.co.nz/services3.asp

What is so bad about twins? Having a twin pregnancy triples most risks associated with pregnancy – such as stillbirth, a serious brain haemorrhage, serious infection, respiratory distress and cerebral palsy. Overall about 20% of twin pregnancies have some problem compared to 6% of singleton pregnancies. Until recently, the problems associated with twins were considered a reasonable compromise for the increased chance becoming pregnant when two embryos were transferred.

The following table summarises a vast amount of information from medical and scientific studies about twins. The actual numbers can vary somewhat from study to study, but the table gives an average picture.

In the table, the figures for stillbirth and death soon after birth come from the register of Australian-New Zealand IVF pregnancies, but most of the other information is about twins in general.

Risk Singleton Pregnancy Twin Pregnancy Risk for Twins
To the mother       
Hospitalisation for ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS) in
an IVF pregnancy 4.6% of pregnancies 9% of pregnancies 2 times higher
Mother dying in childbirth 5 per 100,000 births 15 per 100,000 births 3 times higher
To the children       
Stillbirth or death soon after birth (neonatal and perinatal death) 2.8% of children 6.3% of children 2.5 times higher
Baby admitted to neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) after birth 15% of children 48% of children 3 times higher
A serious brain haemorrhage around birth     5 times higher
Serious infection     3 times higher
Respiratory distress     6 times higher
Cerebral palsy 0.23% of children 1.3% of children 5 times higher
Some handicap 2.5% of deliveries 7.4% of deliveries 3 times higher
Overall       
Estimate of any problem (death, abnormality, or some handicap) 6% of deliveries 20% of deliveries 3 times higher

Having twins also carries considerable costs for public hospital care, with the average hospital cost of birth and neonatal care in New Zealand being approximately six times higher for twins than a singleton birth.

Of course the large majority of twins are fine and many of the problems around birth are temporary or, if ongoing, not too severe. Nevertheless, a twin pregnancy carries significant extra risks that can be eliminated by SET.

top of page
When we reviewed Fertility Associates’ results for the years 2000-2002, we found that 47% of women aged 25 to 35 had a delivery after the transfer of two good quality embryos, with over a third of the deliveries being twins. An alternative would be to transfer only one embryo (SET) and to freeze the ‘second’ good quality embryo, instead of transferring it fresh. If this was done, we calculated that the overall chance of delivery in this group of patients from the same two embryos would have been a very respectable 40%, but only 2% of deliveries would have been twins (due to identical twins).

Fertility Associates now very strongly recommends SET for women 35 and younger having their first or second IVF cycle, who have at least one good quality embryo on the third day after egg collection and this is a requirement for publicly funded treatment. We are pleased to report that the preliminary pregnancy rates from people choosing SET in 2004 is as high as we expected.

Back to Top
tiptoes View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 05 November 2007
Points: 2490
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tiptoes Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13 January 2009 at 10:44pm
So it doesn't sound like the risk is higher than conceiving naturally but there's lots of extra risks involved for both the mother and babies and it looks like it's a similar rate of success with one egg as it is with two eg 40% vs 47% (hopefully I'm reading that correctly).
Back to Top
fionae View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 November 2008
Location: Gisborne, NZ
Points: 342
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fionae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2009 at 7:44am
Thank you for all of that. Yes I read that as being the same. I am 37 and feel time is ticking....Sounds all a bit scary though and would be nice to get it out of the way at once!!!
Anyway thanks heaps will chat to specialist I guess about our options and what he reckons....
Back to Top
Lulu View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 849
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lulu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2009 at 7:10pm
When we did a private IVF cycle we were also given the statistics on relationship failures after twins - it wasn't pretty!
Lou
Back to Top
tamrib View Drop Down
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 14 November 2008
Points: 6
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote tamrib Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 9:27am
Fiona, don't know if this will make you feel better about a SET, but I got pregnant from a single frozen embryo with my daughter when I was 37 and used my last frozen embryo and am now pregnant with identical twins at the age of 39. (my single embryo split!)

The pregnancy rates are just as good with SET as with multiple embryo transfer but without the increased risks of multiple pregnancy.

Back to Top
ginger View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 2714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ginger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 January 2009 at 10:01am
Originally posted by Lulu Lulu wrote:

When we did a private IVF cycle we were also given the statistics on relationship failures after twins - it wasn't pretty!


We covered that as well at FA, and the specialist we spoke to there made the point that as well as trying to achieve a pregnancy, they have an ethical obligation to the future security of the embryo(s)/baby(ies) in the context of the family environment.
Cuinn Lachlan 23.1.09 - 22:00
Antonia Helene 4.8.11 - 09:41
Back to Top
fionae View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 November 2008
Location: Gisborne, NZ
Points: 342
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote fionae Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 January 2009 at 1:48pm
Thanks all have been through it all with specialist now.....all quite scary so gone off that idea in a big way!!!!!

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.969 seconds.