Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
Emmi_
Senior Member
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: Wellington
Points: 8176
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Big baby, drug free birth? Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:01pm |
So, I know that scan sizes can be more unreliable later in pregnancy, but I had a scan this morning estimating 4.6kgs (10lb 2.3oz), the sonographer said that it is generally pretty reliable give or take a pound... Oh and you can see the fat rolls on her legs and stuff, so not just a case of big bones
So I was hoping for a drug free birth... What is the biggest baby that you have given birth to drug free? This is my first baby (if that makes any difference). And was there any aftermath? (Like tears etc)
I was also wanting to know if anyone has had a baby that has been too big to fit through? Bubs isnt engaged yet (apparently at 39w she was a fraction engaged, but has stayed out since then) I am hoping she will during labour but TBH not convinced she will. Im 165cm, and never thought I had a small pelvis, but find it unusual that shes not engaged yet (which makes me think shes too big..)
As much as I want to avoid drugs and a c section, I would prefer a healthy baby, so if a c section is likely then I would like to prepare myself for it (and be pleasantly surprised when she just pops out with no hassles!) My MW (who has a low induction and c section rate (c sect being 14% I think)) doesnt seem concerned about how big she is (she was estimated to be 2.5kgs at 32w) saying that if she doesnt fit then we will just do a c section (which yes I know, but could you be a little nicer about it?)
HMm sorry for the long post... If you have any experience with big bubbas then I would love to hear your story (good and not so good  ) TIA!
|
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
luvmylittlies
Senior Member
Joined: 08 July 2009
Location: Auckland
Points: 4140
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:05pm |
One of my good friends said that her easiest birth was the largest baby (5.2kg). 5 hours from start to finish. She thinks that because they're bigger the weight of the baby on the cervix progresses things faster. Her next baby was 3.2kg and she was in labour for 3 days!
|
Adoring Mum to Talisin 8/9/11 and Kiara 18/01/10
|
 |
kebakat
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy North
Points: 10980
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:07pm |
I don't personally but I remember one of the girls that was in my due date thread with Daniel had a big baby. Granted it was her 2nd but he was still a very very big boy. don't remember the weight since it was 3 yrs ago.
Its more their head size that is the part to worry about rather than weight. Bubs could be a little chubba bubba but with a small/regular sized head and come out fine.
I managed a posterior bub with an "above average" head size while sucking down gas. My MW afterwards said that I had a very good mentality. In my head I was pushing that boy out and that was all there was too it. No second guessing myself.
|
 |
pekay
Senior Member
Joined: 17 March 2010
Points: 695
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:13pm |
DD was 9lb2oz when born, and about 5 days beofre she was born she was measuring at about 9lb6oz on the scan...so it was pretty accurate for us.
I did have an epi for labour, but I am 100% sure I would have had one even if she was smaller!!! I am a small person, short and small frame (although over weight  ) and she slid on out...lol! Keep in mind, she was in a pretty good position.
Good luck!
|
 |
SophiasMummy
Senior Member
Joined: 17 June 2008
Points: 293
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:15pm |
I had a 9p6oz (4.25kg) delivered with her hand up on her face, with no drugs or gas in 6 3/4 hours total. She was not fully engaged at any point in my pregnancy, moved up a down a lot in last few weeks. I had not had niggles at all then at 5.30am I had first contractions and she was born at 12.15pm. I ended up with 2nd degree tear, but healed pretty well and was out walking her in the pushchair by about 2 weeks after she was born.
So it can be done, we did not realise that she was going to be so big as I did not seem that big, so we were all a bit surprised.
|
|
 |
Emmi_
Senior Member
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: Wellington
Points: 8176
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:15pm |
Thanks guys  Her head circumference is 35cm (well estimated..) not sure how that relates to average or not?
I had heard that too, about bigger babies equal easier births, but thought that was like 9lb rather than 10..
I have always looked forward to labour and birth, and I think I need to calm down and focus on what I need to do and not the what ifs so much. I can only do what I can, and what I cant control there is no point in worrying about
|
|
 |
mummyofprinces
Senior Member
Joined: 10 February 2008
Location: Hibiscus Coast
Points: 8627
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:30pm |
Thats a nice size head!
|
|
 |
pekay
Senior Member
Joined: 17 March 2010
Points: 695
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:32pm |
DD's was 36.5cm, and just looking at her plunket book, that sits above the 97percentile line, so yes, 35cm is big. I too came out with a 2nd degree tear, and although I said she slid out...I was actually pushing for about 90minutes. But yes- Still very possible for you!!
|
 |
Daizy
Senior Member
Joined: 19 July 2007
Points: 3933
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 1:39pm |
I had my 9lb 6ozer without too much trouble, I know thats not quite as big as what they are predicting for your's and it was my second but me being a tiny 5 foot I think it was huge!
My first wasn't tiny either and I didn't have any problems althous the second was probably easier.. maybe required a little more pushing but really 10 minutes as apposed to 8 isn't that much.
I had no drugs and no tearing or anything. It is definately do able, its often not the size that causes complications, (often position, head si as others have said smaller babies have often been more difficult to get out.
All the best!!
|
|
 |
Bizzy
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 10974
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 2:08pm |
kebakat wrote:
Its more their head size that is the part to worry about rather than weight. |
lol i remember saying the exact same thing before i had toby... his weight was estimated at being 11 pounds. He wasnt that big - but he did have a very large 39cm head. And it turned out he was my easiest birth. Pushed him out in five pushes. I had requested pethedine - but only based on my previous birth experience - and it hadnt had a chance to take effect because i gave birth less than five minutes after it was administered.
Our bodies can do amazing things when given a chance and trusted in!
|
|
 |
Kellz
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Gisborne
Points: 7186
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 2:09pm |
Aiden was 4.04kg (8lb14), 52cm long and with a huge 37cm head (same as DD), and I had him completely naturally with no pain reflief or anything and not a tear at all.
Im 160cm short (lol) and 57kgs /size8-10 pre pregnancy.
I only had a 20 wek scan and told midwife not to tell me how big/small she guessed he was. I didnt want t know cos it makes u worry for nothing. You will be fine!
Edited by Kellz
|
 |
Emmi_
Senior Member
Joined: 14 May 2009
Location: Wellington
Points: 8176
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 2:12pm |
 Thanks guys!
gee I feel a little silly after my wee freak out now
|
|
 |
EmDee
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Waikato
Points: 4407
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 2:17pm |
My 9lb 2oz baby came out easier than my 8lb 13oz baby, in saying that though she was my second baby and had a smaller head (34cm compared to 36cm).
For number 1 I used gas and pethidine, for number 2 I only used gas for about an hour.
A friend of mine has had 11lb 2oz and 11lb 3oz babies, both home water births and she didn't have any trouble, though they were her 4th & 5th babies.
Hmm don't know if that is actually any use to you at all sorry!
I like your thoughts here:
Emmi_ wrote:
I have always looked forward to labour and birth, and I think I need to calm down and focus on what I need to do and not the what ifs so much. I can only do what I can, and what I cant control there is no point in worrying about  |
You'll do great, and don't worry about feeling silly, I'm sure we've all freaked out about somehting!
|
DS 8 DD 6 DS 4 DD 2
|
 |
RicKer
Senior Member
Joined: 27 May 2009
Points: 919
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 3:47pm |
I cant really help with the big baby labour topic but regarding size estimates. My DD was estimated to be 8.5-9lb at full term but i went 3 days over and she was 6'1
|
 |
Anonymous55
Senior Member
Joined: 28 January 2010
Points: 1138
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 4:05pm |
Nina was 9lb 9oz and she was my first!
It was an induction at full term and I had no tears or grazing and had no drugs, just some gas for a while.
Don't be too worried!
|
 |
Kalimirella
Senior Member
Joined: 14 November 2009
Location: Waipukurau
Points: 1882
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 5:28pm |
Hmm my DD was 9lb 10oz born and at 36w was estimated 7lb 3oz, she was induced but established labour was only 3 hours, 50m of which was pushing her out, I only got a small 2nd degree tear and no pain relief at all. However her HC was only 34cm and she had lots of fat rolls :P
PS she was born the day after her due date.
|
Kiara is 3 and Teagan is 2, now we're expecting our long awaited 3rd!
|
 |
Richie
Senior Member
Joined: 12 July 2009
Location: Christchurch
Points: 2059
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 5:47pm |
My 'wee' girl was 11lb 8oz (5.215kg), 37cm head and 56m long. 32hr labour followed by emergency C-Sec cause things weren't progressing the way they should have been. My cervix just was not playing the game that day! lol Had no idea she was going to be THAT big altho at our 32wk scan she was weighing approx 2.5kg as well. Even just before the C-Sec the Docs were guessing she was only going to be 8-9lb at most lol. Kinda glad I didn't push her out now cause I'mnot a big person..... I'm tall but quite thin and don't think she would have fitted. A lady who was in my Antenatal group had Emergency C-Sec the day before me cause her bubba got stuck in the birth canal and she was only 9lb 6oz.
Don't be too freaked out about C-Sec if that's the way it ends up going. I had blocked the thought out of my head cause I was terrified of having one and was soooo scared when they told me it was my only option. Looking back tho it was easy peasy and I'll be the first to put my hand up for an elective when #2 comes around! I would have loved to have birthed naturally (was planning water birth with no drugs) but I don't feel like I've been cheated of anything iykwim.
My little brother was 10lb 13oz and Mum had him naturally, no drugs. He was the 6th child tho so he just 'fell out' hehehe His head was 40cm at birth as well. Mum said it wasn't the most pleasant experience but she got over it pretty quick.
Good luck! Hope it all works out the way you want i to.Big babies are great! I'll be terrified if my next baby is small or normal sized..... will be scared I'll break them! lol
|
|
 |
jessiesmum
Senior Member
Joined: 23 January 2010
Points: 212
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 5:48pm |
I honestly don't think the size of the baby has much to do with pain in labour. It's way more to do with the position of the baby. A posterior (its back to your back) baby will be a much harder, more painful labour and also can be the reason their head doesn't descend, labour doesn't progress etc.
I'm afraid I can't speak from experience as my DD was 3.7kg with a 36.5cm head, no pain relief and a tiny tear that didn't need suturing. But I know people who have had huge babies (11lbs etc) with no pain relief. My baby was estimated 3.7kg at 37 weeks (I'm only 1.55m and 47kg pre-pg) with a big head and I've talked to my MW a lot about tearing (I'm terrified) and she says it's all about controlling how quickly the head is born. So when she says don't push - she really means it!
I don't know about scans later in pregnancy - they can make things more stressful than need be. I mean, a pound is a huge variance!
|
DD 2007, Angel Baby 2009, DS 2010
|
 |
My3Sons
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 3744
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 6:40pm |
My 3rd was a bonny 10pd 1oz and he was my fastest and easiest birth by far! 3 hours from first contraction to him being born. He also had a great big head lol. Best of luck, will be interested to hear how big your wee one ends up being
|
|
 |
nicandtyler
Senior Member
Joined: 22 February 2010
Location: North Shore
Points: 291
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 21 May 2010 at 9:16pm |
my ds was 8lbs 11oz (estimated to be around 8lbs) (first baby, not as big as some of the others!  ) 52cm and 37cm head, and the day before i had him i had a scan showing he was posterior  but when i got to hospital he was the right way round (phew) i had gas and pethidine and a 2nd degree tear and grazing, but only a 7 hour labour which was pretty good, and he was out with 4 pushes, but its totally the positioning, my mums a midwife and we were talking the other day about sizes of babies at birth and whether or not a bigger baby leads to a more difficult labour but she said its not the size of the baby its the postition they are in, and sometimes they dont engage until its time for them to come, good luck with the birth, im sure baby will come out perfectly!
|
|
 |