Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
UpsyDaisy
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2009
Points: 550
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Topic: Katmando or ? Carrier Posted: 25 June 2011 at 10:49am |
DH went out and bought a katmandu carrier. We would like to go for some day walks. So we need to get another carrier for me so we can go out together with the twins.
The katmandu one is huge and weighs 2.7 kg on its own however I like that the toddler appears very comfortable and there is a bit of space to pack some food spare nappy extra layer for toddler etc.
How do people get on with the ergos for longer trips. The pics I have seen the older kids (my two are 12kg) don't look as comfy as they seem in the katmandu carrier.
Also how do you take your extra gear. I like to take a fair bit with me - warmer top a light jacket good amount of food and water just in case.
Edited by jules1980
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
Plushie
Senior Member
Joined: 21 May 2008
Points: 3796
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 11:52am |
Those kathmandu carriers crack me up! Theyre like little sedan chairs. I've done a few 4hr tramps with approx 9kg DS on my front in a manduca (which is sameish to an ergo) and he was comfy as. On my back i reckon it'd be even better. I take a person who carries all my things or as DS is on my front i wear a backpack. If you're wearing them on your back a frontpack might be a good investement. Or your DH wear the kathmandu carrier with double the luggage strapped on and you just put what you can fit in the pocket of the ergo. Or a fanny pack/bum bag.
|
 |
kebakat
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy North
Points: 10980
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 11:54am |
Personally if you wanna take more with you like that then I don't think many of the modern carriers are that great for it because if the child is on your back you have to carry a bag on the front of if chid is on the front you need to wear a little backpack on the back. It's not too much of an issue for us because I can get DH to carry a small backpack with lunch and water etc.
eta: when we go on big walks we are taking a lunch box with snacks for 4 of us. Change of clothes and nappies for alex and a jersey for Daniel. Water, camera, wallet, phone, keys etc. It takes up a fair amount of space
Edited by kebakat
|
 |
UpsyDaisy
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2009
Points: 550
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 12:57pm |
Thanks Mmm maybe will have to look into a frontpack... am going to look like a pack mule or even better DH should wear it and he can look like a pack mule. Ah the joys of planning outings with two kids...
I volunteer with the red cross and though not very experienced in bush I did do a search and rescue course and remember the case stories on people getting lost its easy when weather is so changeable in NZ to. After that course I also like to take small torch and a whistle for signalling to searchers.
|
 |
squoggs
Senior Member
Joined: 19 August 2009
Points: 546
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 2:47pm |
The Macpac back packs are awesome, we have the Possum and have used it for multi-day tramps and day walks all over the country. Also use to it potter around with near home when the terrain is a bit rough for the pram. Its comfy for the little one too, our 12mo usually falls asleep in it.
Also have the Macpac frontpack which i thought was a total waste of money, extremely uncomfortable - walked around and up rangitoto island, and ended up seeing the osteopath the next day as my back was so sore. But maybe a nicer one like an ergo would be better.
|
|
 |
AandCsmum
Senior Member
Joined: 13 May 2008
Location: Palmerston North
Points: 8432
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 4:22pm |
I have carried Cooper just recently in our kathmandu carrier, DH had the back pack. The Kathmandu one does have a good amount of carry space in it, I have an older one which has less space.
Would be interesting to see what weight a front pack will carry for?
|
Kel
A = 01.02.04 & C = 16.01.09 & G = 30.03.12
|
 |
Ella1
Senior Member
Joined: 15 June 2008
Points: 1152
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 June 2011 at 10:43pm |
We have a macpac carrier too. When DD was little (up to a year) I mostly carried her in the moby, but DH never liked that, so from 6 months on, he's carried her in the backpack. It's great because it's got storage space under the child seat, and we have the Vamoose, which has an additional little bag that you can zip on. You'd be amazed how much you can take along. (I couldn't because it would become to heavy for me, but DH is an avid tramper and easily carries 20 kgs. ) DD is now 2,5 years and we still use the backpack.
The advantage of the macpac carriers is that the harnass is adjustable, I'm small and DH is over 6 ft. None of the katmandu normal backpacks has a harnass short enough for me, so I didn't even bother checking their baby carrier.
If you go for day tramps, I would go for one with a good fitting harnass (which of course is a very personal thing).
|
 |
UpsyDaisy
Senior Member
Joined: 23 June 2009
Points: 550
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 28 June 2011 at 10:16am |
Ella what sort of macpac pack do you have? I looked on their website and there are three. The most expensive one looks like has a huge ammount of space to pack gear and even a wee day pack that zips off. The town I live in I don't think anywhere sells them tho.
I was looking again at the katmandu pack DH walked with DD down to park and I drove with DS. Probably has 25 ltr storage.
If had just one kid think I would go for a manduca or ergo esp as you can use them from newborn and around town for short trips so much more versatile.
Decided I want storage and a carrier combined so will have to be one of the big beasties. Its a buggar the katmandu or macpac carriers all weigh almost 3 kg on their own tho - 3kg pack plus 12 kg toddler plus a couple of kg food,gear and water eek....
|
 |
Ella1
Senior Member
Joined: 15 June 2008
Points: 1152
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 30 June 2011 at 11:20pm |
Jules, we have the expensive one, the Vamoose. DH was adamant that's what we needed. And sometimes we do fill it all up, including the zip-off backpack, but DH will be wearing it, cause it will be too heavy for me.
The cheapest one (the Koala I think?) does not have an adjustable back. We needed one where you can adjust the back-lenght.
Look out for specials. I remember we got ours with quite a big discount, even though it was the new range that only just had come out.
I think there probably will be some carriers on TM as well, but the older MacPac range is made of heavy duty canvass, and I wonder if that is heavier than the current range.
|
 |
lostAmber
Senior Member
Joined: 04 November 2009
Location: Hamilton
Points: 4413
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 06 July 2011 at 4:23pm |
I have a phil and teds back pack which I like, but there is no way I could do a 4hr walk with it as it pulls on my shoulders too much (must see if it needs adjusting and if this would stop the pain). I also have a manduca which I still use as a front pack and my DD is 12kg, just love it. I should try her on my back in it but i'd have to find the instruction booklet again and that could be an issue lol.
|
|
 |