Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
mum2paris
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy
Points: 6611
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 7:59am |
lol.. only 1 can be engaged linelle cos otherwise she'd have 2 heads down in her pelvis.. which I'm sure would be extremely painful and more than a little squished.. engaged means head is down into the pelvis..theres only room for 1.. of course - the one that decides it's all go first.. will mean that the other will get it's eviction regardless..
fingers crossed for you emma that they stay a tiny bit longer.. every day is better than nothing...From seeing the huge range of bubs in the unit where i am i now feel i can say that. lol... even making it to 34 weeks is just so good.
|
Janine and her 2 cool chicks, Paris & Ayja
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
Maya
Senior Member
Joined: 16 September 2003
Location: Sydney
Points: 23297
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 11:00am |
Yep, and they were just under 5lb each at the last scan a week and a half ago, so they are OK weights if they are born now. I just want to hold out till MOnday...
And I can't even imagine what it would be like if they could both engage - having one head down there is bad enough! Of course the other one has her bum stuck right up under my ribs so I have heartburn at one end, and frequent trips to the loo at the other, happy days!
|
 Maya Grace (28/02/03)
 (02/01/06)
  The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
 Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
 Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
|
 |
baalamb
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 1820
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 11:45am |
All the best, Emma!!  Eek two of them... How exciting and scary all at the same time!
|
 |
Anna
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Auckland
Points: 694
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 11:58am |
Appparently this bub is engaged also but I am not letting myself consider the possibility that he/she may come early!! I know I would just get my hopes up! I think Quinn was engaged early on and he came on his due date (which i think was very considerate of him!!)
Not long to go now Emma, I am so looking forward to seeing thsoe cuties!
|
Anna
|
 |
busymum
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 12236
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 1:49pm |
Emma I can't remember how long Hannah was engaged before I went into labour and since I'm moving house in 3 weeks, all my notes are packed! Briona wasn't engaged until labour, she was posterior. Anyways, keep us all updated, we're really excited for your two little cuties!
|
|
 |
mrs frantic
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 990
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 6:35pm |
mine has been fully engaged and a 3-4 on the scale for almost 3 weeks now...unfortunately other than having a bladder the size of a peanut I havent had any other effects from the whole "head down bum up" thing - not a peep from baby suggestign she might even be thinking about coming out...
might be different with twins though....?
good luck anyway...
|
Mrs Frantic
Baby Maddisyn born 28 Sept 2006
|
 |
busymum
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 12236
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 20 September 2006 at 7:49pm |
LOL Frantic I'm carrying breech at the moment and the peanut analogy just tickles my humour!  I don't think I've had any relief down there since I got pregnant all those months ago!
|
|
 |