Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
fairsk8
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Te Aroha
Points: 829
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 10:41am |
My partner and I had a big talk about this topic last night and he thought I was being stupid and that it doesn't matter that at age 11 they won't understand because they do not understand when they have their other shots what they are for apart from if they don't have them they could get really sick. So i said to him that we will just have to have all boys because I don't feel overly comfortable with making that big a decision for my daughter should I ever have a daughter. So I am with you sarah just hoping for all boys.
|
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
aimeejoy
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Dannevirke
Points: 6415
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 11:34am |
I would give Hannah this vaccination if it became another mainstream one, added to the schedule. I personally dont see how it is much different to the MENZ-B one, its a relatively new vacc and we dont really know the loooong term effects of that one either.
|
Aimee
Hannah 22/10/05
Greer 11/02/08
|
 |
jax
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 3193
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 12:40pm |
I've heard and read a lot about this issue, and as far as medical advances go it sounds good. However, some of my concerns would also lie with just how well it has actually been tested. That aside (and I could be VERY wrong here admittedly), I thought it was just that women who are sexually promiscuous have a higher *risk* of developing HPV, rather than sexual activity being the outright cause for someone who develops it. I can imagine that the definition of 'sexual promiscuity' would be highly contentious anyhow - my next question would be just how is that standard established? Anyway, I probably need to watch this develop and contemplate things a bit more, before I can come to a definite decision as to whether or not I'd be happy with my child having it. At this point in time it is likely that I would, but as I mentioned earlier in the post, my concern lies with just how well it has been tested etc.
|
Jacquie - Mama to Erin, 13.07.06 - Chief Cat Chaser & Marmite Sammie Eater
Love many, trust few, harm none. ~Anon~
|
 |
nikkitheknitter
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Westie
Points: 7556
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 1:03pm |
Well at least we have 10 to 11 years before we have to decide whether our kids should have this. By then they should have found whether there are any long term effects?!?
(Anyway, that's what I'm clinging to!)
|
 |
lizzle
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 8346
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 3:28pm |
I think that you can also be born with HPV from your mother? Not sure but one of my friends has it, and was told that it may not have come from sexual activity.
And the "license to be promiscious", what a load of crap! It's like the pill and stuff. Who gets an injection for contraception and then says "well, off to sleep with as many people as possible. yippee!" ??- very few! Most people are a lot more sensible than that!
|
 |
fairsk8
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Te Aroha
Points: 829
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 4:32pm |
Yes it can be passed on to you by your mum. When born because the baby passes thru the infected area. Once you have HPV there is really no way of getting rid of it, it stays in your system.
|
|
 |
nikkitheknitter
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Westie
Points: 7556
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 25 February 2006 at 8:54pm |
Yeah, I can't really blame my promiscuity on any form of contraception.. it happened anyway
|
 |
Maya
Senior Member
Joined: 16 September 2003
Location: Sydney
Points: 23297
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 February 2006 at 8:27am |
Good point on the time thing Nikki - by the time our kids get to 11, the kids having it now should have some idea if there are any side effects.
|
 Maya Grace (28/02/03)
 (02/01/06)
  The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
 Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
 Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
|
 |
Sarah Beth
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 2405
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 February 2006 at 8:41am |
I agree Nikki, very good point on the time thing, I didn't even think about that
|
|
 |
nikkitheknitter
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Westie
Points: 7556
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 26 February 2006 at 8:19pm |
Sucks for those with older kids tho
Maybe they'll wait a few years anyway for putting it on the regular Imms list
|
 |
daikini
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Lower Hutt
Points: 4490
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 27 February 2006 at 11:15am |
And if they wait a few years, then Kiya's going to be in the agegroup for the testers...
|
Becca, mum of 2 girls & 3 boys
|
 |