New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Nearly 39 Weeks & Not Engaged
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedNearly 39 Weeks & Not Engaged

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
blessedwiththebest View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 February 2010
Points: 188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blessedwiththebest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Nearly 39 Weeks & Not Engaged
    Posted: 14 January 2011 at 11:58am
I had a MW appt yesterday at 38w3d & baby hasn't engaged.

This is my first pregnancy. I've heard it's common for subsequent babies to not engage til much later on in pregnancy, or even not until labour starts, but what about firsts?

Has anyone else not engaged til late with their first babies & still had them on time?

Picking I'll go overdue!
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Plushie View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 May 2008
Points: 3796
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Plushie Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2011 at 1:04pm
I wrote this in our due date thread, but just in case it gets lost in the chatter: My friend didnt engage or drop until she was actually in labour! She was overdue by 8 days though, had her bubba the night before the day she was booked to be induced.
Thats all i know though, one second hand experience...sorry!
Back to Top
Lucky apple View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 13 November 2009
Points: 1047
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Lucky apple Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2011 at 3:18pm
I delivered 38+4 - I wasn't engaged before I went into labour. Don't worry too much!! Good luck for the net couple of weeks :-) It's exciting!!!!
Back to Top
MrsEmma View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 19 March 2009
Points: 2769
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrsEmma Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2011 at 3:47pm
I was 3/5 engaged around 37 weeks, 2/5 engaged at 38 weeks and then he went up and down the last 3 weeks (had him at 40+6) but I don't think it makes too much difference how engaged they are!

All the best for the next few weeks!


Back to Top
mothermercury View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 12 December 2009
Points: 884
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mothermercury Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2011 at 5:44pm
I'm pretty sure Chloe never engaged until I was induced at 41 weeks. The induction went smoothly though and I was in labour for 17 hours from start to finish, which isn't that bad.
Back to Top
High9 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 July 2009
Location: North Island
Points: 6750
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote High9 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14 January 2011 at 10:07pm
Lily engaged very early, but 2 of the mums in my antenatal group had babies who didn't engage and it was due to their position (getting stuck) or being too large to fit into the pelvis... I would have a chat to your mw about what it could possibly mean and see if she has any plans for a scan to check size, or his positioning...
Back to Top
ginger View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 2714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ginger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2011 at 12:10pm
I didn't engage with Cuinn until labour - I'd had an OB visit the day before and he said that Cuinn was still up high enough that it would even be a bad idea to induce at that stage (we were to have a c-section on the Saturday - I went into labour on the Friday in the early hours of the morning). He didn't even have any false starts (engage, then move) - he was just being lazy ... You're not having a boy per chance?
Cuinn Lachlan 23.1.09 - 22:00
Antonia Helene 4.8.11 - 09:41
Back to Top
ginger View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 2714
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote ginger Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2011 at 12:11pm
Oops - sorry! I was Due on teh 20th, and delivered on the 23rd, so a couple of days over. Not too bad really!
Cuinn Lachlan 23.1.09 - 22:00
Antonia Helene 4.8.11 - 09:41
Back to Top
rachelsea View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 February 2008
Location: Lower Hutt
Points: 3797
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rachelsea Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15 January 2011 at 12:23pm
My DD didn't engage till I was in labour either, and I had a quick one with her (3.5hrs). She was 3.5weeks early...
DD 4yrs
DS 2yrs

Back to Top
Bambino View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 12 February 2010
Points: 157
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bambino Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 8:49am
Hi... I am 39 weeks and haven't engaged yet. But baby is posterior and so I need to do a few things apparently to get him to roll over so he is more likely to...

Wish he would engage though... sick of the heartburn!!!

Good luck!

Bx
Back to Top
blessedwiththebest View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 23 February 2010
Points: 188
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote blessedwiththebest Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 9:45am
Thanks girls!!

Lil_Nic, I actually had a scan at 38weeks cos they thought baby was breech - but turns out baby was in the perfect position, head down & back on my left side. The sonographer said baby was measuring a little bit on the big side/is "very healthy" haha but didn't seem concerned about not fitting through the pelvis? Hmm, might have to bring it up at my next MW appt on Thursday.

Ginger, ta for your comment. I'm not sure if I'm having a boy or girl - we left the sex as a surprise - can't wait to find out on the day though!

Rachelsea, ooh FX I have a similar experience then, wouldn't mind a 3.5hour labour heh

I've been going for hourly walks each day to try get baby to get nice & low. 2 days ago, I marched up a huuuge flight of stairs (if anyone knows Wanganui - the Durie Hill stairs!) & felt good afterwards, but not really any different. Then last night I had a couple of bouts of diarrhoea - sorry TMI - so maybe that was a sign of baby dropping? Hope it meant something anyway... otherwise I've just told the world I had the runs for no reason haha.
Back to Top
Kellz View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Gisborne
Points: 7186
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Kellz Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 10:40am
Both my babies were not engaged until labour,...and I had heartburn right up until I had each of them too!
Back to Top
TheKelly View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 March 2010
Points: 12728
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote TheKelly Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 11:18am
I said this in your due thread Jess but remember there is no rule or law that says a first baby HAS to be engaged before labour starts, or a few weeks before hand, she/he may engage a day before labour,just before labour or a few days before.
You can encourage engagement by lying on your left side at all times including in the bath and going up and down steps sideways,swimming breast stroke, and squatting

Haha, my second I dont know when he engaged BUT I had heartburn 3 frigging days AFTER his birth





Back to Top
MrsJMcD View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 February 2009
Points: 533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MrsJMcD Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 4:54pm
I'm sure someone's already told you this, but just in case...sitting on a swiss ball is meant to be great for getting bubs where he or she needs to be...and i found it really comfy towards the end of my pregnancy.
Back to Top
High9 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 14 July 2009
Location: North Island
Points: 6750
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote High9 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16 January 2011 at 10:39pm
Don't mean to scare you by that comment either! But could be something to just discuss with the mw perhaps!

GL with everything!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.720 seconds.