Are Boys or Girls cheaper?

Are boys or girls cheaper to buy for.

I vote girls.
They need so much more to make just one outfit dresses and tops leggings and matching shoes for each outfit, Boys on the other hand jeans tee a hoodie same shoes and your away.
Tho my Pumpkin patch problem has cost me alot so boys can also cost your pocket.

um, GIRLS are dearer, I have just found out. I have a small clothes addiction with my son, but that has cranked upa whole other level since having a girl, trust me!

I had a friend say to me when I was pregnant with the gremlins "OMG, three girls, imagine what that's going to cost you in sanitary products when they're teenagers!"
But when I thought about it, teenage girls don't eat, they starve themselves, whereas teenage boys eat you out of house and home (trust me, I know, I have two 6ft+ brothers!) so it all evens out in the end

BOTH  are as equal as each other I say. I spent less on Mercedes because she got her sisters stuff, including toys, clothes, shoes etc..  As for Alize well the novelty of having a boy has done nothing to help the budget And the fact that I never own any boys gear at all means I use the excuse to myself that I can indulge in boys toys, clothes etc.  (I guess the same as having a girl for the first time)

Maya wrote: But when I thought about it, teenage girls don't eat, they starve themselves, whereas teenage boys eat you out of house and home (trust me, I know, I have two 6ft+ brothers!) so it all evens out in the end

Tell me about it Emma, DSS has moved in with us, and my groceries for the week cost an extra $100 and I will have to top up fruit, bread and milk by weeks end...

lolol, you just reminded me of a few books paris has gotten out of the library.. has anyone else seen em "if you give a pig a pancake.." and "if you take a mouse to the movies" theres more too, but lol you so just sounded like them!

Anyway, I must say, girls are soooo much dearer, i am dreading my girls teenage years, seriously.
yeah they might starve em'selves, but think of the make-up, sanitary stuff, makeup, jewellery (expecially my girls who already have a thing for jewellery thanks to mummys love of all things sparkly), clothes jewellery, make-up, clothes and accessories and more clothes and jewellery, purses, sunnies, hairties. lol. oooh and shoes!!!

what scares me is that well, we got paris into wearing a lip-balm (strawberry of course) cos her nervous habit is picking at her lips (causing sores and splits.. icky), but now, her little sis has to have a strawberry one too, mine are gonna be doubley troubley i think.
he he Emma.. just imagine how much quicker the gremlins are going to want those things once Maya gets em.. at least my two aren't terribly far apart in age!

oh god, i forgot jewellery. Lucky I work at MHJ, as I only like gold and real stones, so.....

Chovynz wrote: I reckon boys are cheaper. Just give them a stick and they can turn it into a gun. Give a stick to a girl and she wants a dolly. Next thing you know she's asking for a car. After that "I waaaaaanntttt toooooo ggeeeeeeeeeetttttt maaaaaaaarrrrrrrrriiiiiiieeeeddddd" That alone costs anywhere from 2k to $200,000k (depending on her father), Then she wants kids!!! starts the whole freaking cycle all over again only this time YOU have to pay for your daughters wedding.

So totally agree with you there, Andrew will turn anything into a gun at the moment  and I was so the little girl that got everything she wanted for her wedding cos daddy had an open wallet (I was good and didn't go that overboard (my dress was only $600 but it was my dress) but I still got more or less everything I wanted). I dread to actually think how much my parents paid for my wedding (I know my mum has calculated it up and it's nothing on DH's parents ($945) .

Boys are cheaper. Tooo much choice for gils clothes. I would go so nuts sopping.. boys clothes are quite limited with what you can get, and then what you like of what you can get....

boys are wayyyy cheaper if i had a girl i would be bankrunb