New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Getting pg article...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedGetting pg article...

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
freckle View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2008
Points: 4773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote freckle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Getting pg article...
    Posted: 08 March 2009 at 8:36am
I was just searching good old google to see if there was any info about if chem pg can alter ya cycle as I reckon I may be oving real early this month... anyhow I came across this article ....

http://ezinearticles.com/?Getting-Pregnant-After-Miscarriage&id=886457 ....

This can't right!!! It says you shouldn't even try and fertilise the egg if you Ov later than day 15!!?? Man I've got no bloody chance if this is the case... There is no references or anything but just wondering if anyone else has heard this before....
mum to 3 lovely girls :D
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
choco69 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 30 August 2008
Location: North Shore, Auckland
Points: 840
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote choco69 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 8:58am
i don't believe it - the biggest problem with the internet is people can put up whatever they like

there are alot of people who ovulate late and go on to have successful pregnancies

here are another couple of articles to consider (did a quick google)

medicinenet
ovulationcalculator.org
Back to Top
freckle View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2008
Points: 4773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote freckle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 9:19am
yep I agree - it is a real problem with the net, completely unreferenced info which causes unnecessary worry... but I still can't help myself reading all this stuff...

... and if I think about it rationally my DD was the result of a CD35 (approx) ovulation ... it just worries me that my long cycles are gonna cause more probs this time, esp as I had a chem pg last cycle...

Thanks for the links... they seem more along the lines of what I had heard before... I'd just not heard stuff about not trying to fertilise the egg with old sperm (3 days +) and not trying to fertilise old eggs etc...
mum to 3 lovely girls :D
Back to Top
Jane25 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 23 December 2008
Location: Christchurch
Points: 370
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Jane25 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 9:37am
I Ov'd on CD 32 so hopefully all is ok - it is a bit worrying reading that sort of stuff. I have done a bit more googling (could't help myself ) and I think many people have had successful pg's with late ovulation. A lot say the luteal phase is what matters and if that is shortened from late Ov then there is not enough time for implantation but who knows??

This site made me feel a bit better about it Also theres one that got PG the month after Chem pg...

Ovusoft

[/url]
Back to Top
freckle View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2008
Points: 4773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote freckle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 9:49am
Jane you'll be fine!! I have always had long cycles and have had two healthy girls with ovulating late... Sorry if I made ya stress!!
I was just thinking it was a bit different from lots of other stuff I had read and wanted to make sure others agreed ...
Strangely the reason I was googling is cos I thought I was Oving way too early this month (CD15) and that's what I came up with... crazy!!
mum to 3 lovely girls :D
Back to Top
asicsgal View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 21 October 2008
Location: The Naki
Points: 1540
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote asicsgal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 4:53pm
Yeah it is pretty scary the stuff on the internet, it's easy to worry yourself sick. Thanks for posting those links girls
Back to Top
jem View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2009
Points: 575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jem Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 7:39pm
ummm dont mean to sound completely dumb but what exactly is a chem pg?
Back to Top
freckle View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2008
Points: 4773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote freckle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 8:27pm
that's not dumb I would have asked the same thing a few weeks ago It's a chemical pregnancy - basically an early miscarriage. The egg is fertilised but doesn't implant properly for some reason or another from what I understand...

Edited by freckle
mum to 3 lovely girls :D
Back to Top
jem View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 13 February 2009
Points: 575
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jem Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08 March 2009 at 11:52pm
ohhh ok .... theres so much to learn with all this baby making lol

oh by the way does anyone like the picture of my husband under my name? I just let him know that im using his photo lol
Back to Top
freckle View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 03 December 2008
Points: 4773
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote freckle Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 March 2009 at 12:10pm
jem - he he - he's a hottie he could do to build some muscles in those arms though
mum to 3 lovely girls :D
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.816 seconds.