New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Weeks vs cm size
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedWeeks vs cm size

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
mamanee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Hamilton
Points: 2244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mamanee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Weeks vs cm size
    Posted: 21 March 2007 at 5:02pm
Just wondering where everyone is in regards to cm size.

I know everyone is different, but I read that it should be approximately equal to how many weeks you are.

At 30 weeks, I'm measuring 34cm.

I expecting him to be of gigantic proportions anyway, but just wondering if this is 'really' that much bigger than normal?
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
Sarah Beth View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 2405
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarah Beth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 5:17pm
some people do just measure bigger, but as long as it is consistant (IE at 31 weeks you are 35) it isn't too much of a big deal, you may be sent for a growth scan though.

FYI at 31 weeks I measured 33cm
Back to Top
mamanee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Hamilton
Points: 2244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mamanee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 5:23pm
Thanks Sarah Beth.

I was measured today, but forgot that I'm 31 weeks tomorrow, so I guess it's not THAT much bigger.

At nearly 29 weeks I was 32 cm so pretty consistent.
Back to Top
Sarah Beth View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 2405
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarah Beth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 5:25pm
yip that sounds good to me (in my very unprofessioanl opinion of course). If you or midwife is worried you can go for a scan to check size.
Back to Top
kebakat View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy North
Points: 10980
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote kebakat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 6:42pm
I'm sure your midwife would say something if it was something to worry about!
Back to Top
hailstones View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Dunedin
Points: 1302
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote hailstones Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 6:47pm
I measured 36 -37cm at 38 weeks and my M.W was worried cause the baby didn't seem to be growing much......Elle was 9lb15oz, thank god she didn't grow anymore

Back to Top
busymum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 12236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote busymum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 8:13pm
The give or take is usually 2cm, so 3cm is fine. I suspect your baby growth spurted this week just gone and that you'll be just 2cm over next time, or thereabouts.

Why are you expecting a big baby?
Back to Top
mamanee View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Hamilton
Points: 2244
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mamanee Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 10:05pm
My MIL keeps reminding me that all of her children were 9.5lbs+, so if he takes after DP, then I am expecting him to be quite big. Although I was only 7lbs, so maybe he'll take after me. He's just measured quite big at all the stages, like over 23 weeks at my 22 week scan.

Back to Top
peanut butter View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 20 February 2007
Points: 8044
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote peanut butter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 10:19pm
How do you measure? I have been trying to feel the top of my uterus but dont really know what to feel for...All i know is it should be near my belly button around now. (19wks, 1 day - not what my ticker is saying today)
Back to Top
miss View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 2547
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote miss Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21 March 2007 at 10:40pm
I don't know how accurate measing exterior is - or actually scans for that matter! the amount of people who have been told they are having big babies then have a baby between 8-9 lbs (which is sa decent size but not scary!)when expecting well over 9lbs is quite high from what I have read!

I know that they expect the scans to show a different size each time which is why the earlier ones are condsidered more accurate than the later ones as a predictor of due dates. My 3 scan dates so far are June 24, 22 and 18.
Back to Top
MyMinis View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: werribee Vic
Points: 2771
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote MyMinis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 7:16am
my midwife hasnt measured my bump yet, but with haleigh i was right on the dot.
I dont believe scans weight estimates for the fact I was told Haleigh wasnt going ot be over 8lb and she was 9lb 13oz. So I wont believe them this time when they try to tell me the est weight of this bubs when I have my 32wk scan.
But all they cna do is guess.

Edited by haleighsmum
Back to Top
Sarah Beth View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 2405
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Sarah Beth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 7:40am
Miss - they use the scans more just to find out if you are within normal ranges, and the measurements for fundal height are not a good indicator, especially if you are over weight
Back to Top
luna View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 408
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote luna Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 9:40am
I wouldn't personally be too concerned. I measured bigger right thru and my midwife reckoned I'd be having a big baby. Amelia was 8lb 4oz, so she wasn't huge. Sometimes it's just the way you carry - from the back nobody would have known I was pregnant!
Selina



Back to Top
Bombshell View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 6665
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bombshell Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 9:46am
DH and I were both 7 pounders...we ended up with miss 9 pound 8!!!

I measured 2 - 4 weeks ahead throughout...and at 35 measured 39 and at 38 weeks measured 41 plus!!! We just threw away the tape after that...actually specialist face was funny when he decided the measurements were a load of crap with me anyways...breechbaby didnt help measurements either..
Back to Top
BaAsKa View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 3844
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote BaAsKa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 11:19am
Well my midwife measured me the other day and felt where the my uterus is and im measuring at over 25 weeks pregnant when im only 23 weeks!! which is what all my scans seem to be saying too BUT my scans also show that he has super long legs like my first son so thats OK
Back to Top
Nikki View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 02 October 2003
Location: West Auckland
Points: 2279
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Nikki Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 11:38am
My doc measured me for the first time on mon - I was measuring 28cm at just over 26 weeks, but she seemed happy with the growth. My scans have shown an edd exactly the same as my edd based on lmp so far.

Sounds like alot of people measure slightly more than they should for their date (I was starting to worry if bub would be big too! haha) .. but I also think bub has just gone through a growth spurt as I was really hungry for a few weeks and gained alot of weight!
DS (5yrs) and DD (3yrs)
Back to Top
mummy_becks View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 14931
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mummy_becks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 1:05pm
I wouldn't worry I thought I was huge and measuring well ahead but I was always bang on. And with your MIL so don't worry about her, I have learnt to ignore the "I had big babies" comments as all her babies were over 10lb and we haven't had one born over 10lb. My DH was 11lb 4 born and I was half an ounce under 10lb so everyone told us we would be having big babies. Nope ours have been average sizes just VERY long and thats their weight. 
I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!
Back to Top
mum2paris View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Palmy
Points: 6611
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote mum2paris Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 1:49pm
he he, i was the opposite, at your stage i was measuring 28 weeks and it was going backwards!.. still growth scan showed Ayja was just sitting curled up at the bottom of the womb and therefore it wasn't as high up as it should have been. Fair enough she was smallish at 6lb 2 but was only just on 37 and a half weeks, Paris i was tiny too and she was 7lb 3. outside mearuements depends alot on baby's postion and how your body lies and its proportions too. It's normal for scans to be either a bit bigger or smaller as well, If we had gone by our late growth scan with ayja her head was gonna be huge (i saw the circumference on the screen and nearly died!).   I was 7lb born, and mike was 4 lb at 30 weeks.   In the next few weeks you'll find you grow heaps as they usually start to stack on the weight at around this stage, and the last 6 weeks they get all the nice chubby fat too. Don't let it freak you out, no matter how big baby is, unless is mammoth sized, lol, you'll be fine.. i actually found the bigger of our two's birth much easier and nicer, bigger babies you can actually feel what you are trying to push out.
Janine and her 2 cool chicks, Paris & Ayja

Back to Top
Maya View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 September 2003
Location: Sydney
Points: 23297
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Maya Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 9:09pm
I was measuring 42 at 38 weeks with Maya (the day before I went into labour, she ended up being 9lb1oz) and with the gremlins they gave up measuring around 30 weeks coz it was too depressing - on my chart for 36 weeks (my last check up) my midwife wrote 50+
Maya Grace (28/02/03)
(02/01/06)
The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
Back to Top
busymum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 12236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote busymum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 March 2007 at 10:01pm
50+

I seem to carry my babies far back and measure 2-3 weeks behind, consistently throughout the 3rd trimester (I just get further and further behind lol) And then I have 7lb 3oz; 8lb 4oz; 8lb babies! Go figure.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.320 seconds.