Author |
Topic Search Topic Options
|
fattartsrock
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 6441
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:17pm |
Charlotte was 2 weeks late and I wanted her left as long as poss, I truely felt she would come in her own time, however I had been in labour on and off for days so I ended up being "hurried along"...
I do feel a bit "antsy" when I hear of people asking to be induced before time etc becasue they are "over it". I'm a bit old fashioned in the fact that I think they come in their own time and if baby is safe and happy and mum is safe, well, leave it be...
(I also don't "believe" in finding out the gender of babies, either ...see, told ya I am old fashioned...)
|
The Honest Un PC Parent of 2, usually stuck in the naughty corner! :P
|
 |
Sponsored Links
|
|
 |
lizzle
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 8346
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 9:54pm |
Jake was induced at 14 days overdue, BUT when he came out, he was nothing like an overdue baby - no peely skin and was only 7lb something,. i think my dates were out. shoulda left him in....but hahah annie, i was sooooo over it!
decided with baby three I am going to ask the midwife to work out the due date and then add 12 days - so then i won't be disapointed!
|
 |
Mazzy
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Waikato
Points: 1494
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 10:17pm |
joshierocks wrote:
Bizzy - you made the right decision to be induced. Your babies were well cooked, they needed to come out, and sometimes nature needs a helping hand.
Do not feel like a hypocrite. Feel like a mother who did the right thing to get her babies safely into this world  |
What she said  From memory you left it for as long as possible and withstood heaps of pressure from the medical professionals, so I don't think you're a hypocrite at all. You did what you believed in, as well as doing what was best for your kids - that's awesome.
As for a baby calcifying, that gives me the shivers. Poor woman.
I have a friend who is a midwife and her babies are always overdue. Last one was four weeks post dates (she home births with support form colleagues) and came out fine (if rather big). But then I hear of other stories of babies who die at 42 weeks...so it's a hard call to make.
DD2 was 10 days overdue and didn't peel much at all. There was a tiny bit of placenta deterioration but hardly any.
|
Mum to two gorgeous girls!
|
 |
Maya
Senior Member
Joined: 16 September 2003
Location: Sydney
Points: 23297
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 23 September 2008 at 10:19pm |
Maya was 2 weeks early and had meconium in her waters.
I'm fully convinced that if I hadn't been induced I'd still be pregnant with the gremlins. They were far too happy in there and they are still grumpy with me for making them be born before they were ready
And I was induced with lil miss just coz I was over it lol  But to be fair, I had been vomiting every day for 34 weeks by the time she was born so I feel a little justified about it!
I guess I'm sitting on the intervention side of the fence on this one. Yes 99% of babies will come on their own given the chance, but the risks DO increase with time and advances in obstetric practises are the reason why so many fewer babies are stillborn or die from complications of labour/delivery. I personally would elect not to go over 40 weeks.
JM2CW.
|
 Maya Grace (28/02/03)
 (02/01/06)
  The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
 Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
 Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
|
 |
lilfatty
Senior Member
Joined: 22 August 2007
Location: Waitakere
Points: 9799
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 September 2008 at 7:16am |
Maya wrote:
I guess I'm sitting on the intervention side of the fence on this one. Yes 99% of babies will come on their own given the chance, but the risks DO increase with time and advances in obstetric practises are the reason why so many fewer babies are stillborn or die from complications of labour/delivery. I personally would elect not to go over 40 weeks. JM2CW. |
I went over but was happy (to a point) to let Issy stay in ...
I do believe in intervention though ... if I didnt ... Issy might not be here as she went into respitory distress in the process of trying to get out.
I also think that medical advances are the reason that its no longer a common occurance for women to die during child birth.
(Although if you ask DH he will say medical intervention is the reason we have so many emergency c sections)
|
Mummy to Issy (3) and Elias (18 months)
I did it .. 41 kgs gone! From flab to fab in under a year LFs weight blog
|
 |
MrsMojo
Senior Member
Joined: 18 March 2008
Location: Wellington
Points: 8202
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 September 2008 at 7:54am |
lilfatty wrote:
I do believe in intervention though ... I also think that medical advances are the reason that its no longer a common occurance for women to die during child birth.
|
I agree with this completely. I beleive in intervention when necessary and I am pleased that medical advances have meant that pregnancy and birth are safer. I will always birth in a hospital because I am high risk of requiring a blood transfusion.
But as I said earlier I think that birth is a natural occurence that all species go through. I think that medical proffessionals do like to intervene and control even in instances where it's not necessary and I think if left to come out in their own time most babies would
There is actually a midwife in Wellington that has a standard birth procedure which includes induction and forceps plus a shot of syntocin afterwards to get that placenta out toot sweet. Nearly all of her births are identical because she controls them and the birth plan is hers, not the parents.
I can't comment whether I would get induced or not because I've not been in a situation where I had to think of it. Having said that I did have Michaela's placenta induced because of my bleeding disorder - the specialist and midwife said it would be safest.
|
|
 |
emz
Senior Member
Joined: 25 November 2006
Location: Christchurch
Points: 5321
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 September 2008 at 8:06am |
I think some babies would come, and others wouldn't.
I feel too that sometimes medical professionals are too quick to jump on the bandwagon and induce, but IMHO I would rather be induced than have a dead baby if there was a chance that could happen.
I wasn't induced with DS, but had a lot of intervention during the labour and wouldn't change it for those circumstances because Jack and I would probably be quite unwell if I'd just left it.
There's definitely a reason why half of us don't die during child birth anymore, and if that means you have to induce then so be it.
|
 |
caitlynsmygirl
Senior Member
Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 8777
|
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 24 September 2008 at 9:04am |
I can understand why women who go over want to do anything to get the baby out...by 40 weeks (ha or 30 even ) your over it , you feel fat, and tired , and if you are one of the freaks that doesnt  , then most women are at least anxious to meet their baby .
I believe that mother and baby generally know what each other is doing , yet the powers that be , determine when the baby can come out .
As there is not many births of babies that have gone over two weeks and we dont know all the possible outcomes, as opposed to premature birth , its a risk i personally wouldn't like to take ....altho, at least when they are still in your womb you know where they are all the blimming time , and they cant answer back ...
|
|
 |