| Author | 
  
   
       Topic Search    Topic Options
    | 
 
 
  
   
   Bizzy  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: New Zealand
    Points: 10974
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 14 July 2006 at 9:43am | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   toby had a huge head and it only took five pushes - so bigger doesnt mean harder.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  | 
   Sponsored Links
   | 
   
  
 
 | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   AnnC  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Taranaki
    Points: 6796
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 14 July 2006 at 11:04am | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   I would say my 9lber was hard to push out although also depends on the woman whose giving birth and their birth canal, I don't think too much matter on the size of the woman (big or small, fat or skinny) I think its to do with the insides.  Josh got stuck on my pelvic bone so there was that much room there so thats why he took longer as he kept being pushed back in.  I just think he made room for my 8lber 2nd one (a daughter).  I am hoping for another 8lber rather than 9lber this time around too.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  
   
    
     Ann
  
 
Also Mum to Josh (15) and Brooke (10)
      
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   emeldee  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 1251
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 14 July 2006 at 3:10pm | 
 
 
  
   
   
   Toni - I went to visit Jax yesterday and the woman in the bed opposite her had an 11 pounder. He looked about 3 months old! 9lbs is a good weight - and either way, you'll cope wonderfully and have a gorgeous little person in your lives within the next fortnight.    
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     
 
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   mummy_becks  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 14931
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 14 July 2006 at 5:56pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   I was told throughout my pregnancy with Andrwe that I was going to have a big baby, at least 10lbs. He came out at 39 weeks and 8 lb 4 ounces. This one i'm guessing should be around the same - hopefully!!!
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   Maya  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 16 September 2003
    Location: Sydney
    Points: 23297
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 15 July 2006 at 10:30pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   11 pounds! I'd shoot myself!
    
   
   | 
 
 
  
   
    
       Maya Grace (28/02/03)
   (02/01/06)
    The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
   Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
   Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
      
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   Maya  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 16 September 2003
    Location: Sydney
    Points: 23297
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 15 July 2006 at 10:32pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   Oh but on a serious note, low birthweight babies have a higher incidence of obesity in later life than higher birthweight babies. Apparently to do with the way their metabolism works in the womb. I don't fully understand it, but Maya's specialist told me that when she was sick and losing weight all the time, and I have since heard it a few other times as well.
 
 So that's a good reason to be happy about having a bigger bub.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  
   
    
       Maya Grace (28/02/03)
   (02/01/06)
    The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
   Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
   Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
      
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   jack_&_charli  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: christchurch
    Points: 7155
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 11:07am | 
 
 
  
   
   
   my mum said i was always petite and my sis was the big one......complete reversal now i tell ya!!!!     
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   my2angels  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 3943
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 1:09pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
    i couldnt push kobe out and he was only 7lb 2oz, he had to be sucked out after 3 hours of pushing but Addy at 8lb 7oz was much much easier, only 15 minutes of pushing.
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   james  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: New Zealand
    Points: 7255
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 2:17pm | 
 
 
  
   
   
   when i was in hospital having james the midwife who was there tur the frist stage of my laubour had just helped with a c-section of a 12pounder almost made me change my mind right there and then   
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     <a href="http://lilypie.com"><img src="http://b4.lilypie.com/nLJ5p13.png" alt="Lilypie 4th Birthday Ticker" border="0"  /></a>
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   aimeejoy  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Dannevirke
    Points: 6415
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 2:37pm | 
 
 
  
   
   
   12    No wonder it was a c-section! 
 Now that I am a little more open to the thought of going thru labour again, I keep telling myself that 2nd time round is much easier - everyone seems to get there babes out heaps quicker!    
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     Aimee
 
 Hannah 22/10/05
 Greer 11/02/08
 
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   mummy_becks  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 14931
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 3:06pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   If second time round is going to be faster then I have to get myself to the hospital at the first sign of a contraction. I took 4 hours total with Andrew, so the second may not even make it to the hospital in time.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   MILF  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Antarctica/Invercargill ;)
    Points: 1988
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 3:30pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   x was supposed to be about 7, 71/2 lbs and was 5lb 15oz.  so am reasonably glad they got that wrong.
 i have heard that bigger babies are easier to push out, as you have gravity working with you too, once they start they go whoosh - of course, not having had a big baby, i couldnt comment on whether that is true or not.
 
 i have a question - what was the sizes of your second baby in comparison to your first?  i dont know if i need to buy 0000 sizes for this baby ( we didnt with x, thought we would get away with just 000 sizes for her, which was ridiculous of course after she was born)  i am also looking at fitted cloth  nappies and dont know whether it is worth investing in some newborn sizes or not - such a guessing game!
    
   
   | 
 
 
  
   
    
     Lyla - mum to 
 
Xanthe -    my big 4 year old   
and
 Jordis -    1 year old   
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   nikkitheknitter  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Westie
    Points: 7556
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 3:49pm | 
 
 
  
   
   
   My theory with the nappy thing is that they grow too damn fast to justify the cost.
 
It sounds like you have small babies generally, so I'd still go with the 0000. (Then at least you can reuse most of Xanthe's stuff!) Save receipts tho, so you can change sizes if the babe is unusually large!    
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   my2angels  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 3943
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 5:13pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   we didnt buy much in 0000 cos they said she was so big but even at 8lb 7oz we had to go out and buy some more 0000 because the 000 (0-3mth) clothes are way to big and her we legs dont go anywhere near the feet and its to bunchy around her face.
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   mummy_becks  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 14931
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 16 July 2006 at 8:23pm | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   Cos I was told I was having a big baby I only brought 2 0000 pieces. Lets just say when we left the hospital DH brought up a storm buying 7 0000 outfits as Andrew didn't have any clothes. If i'm having a girl this time then we will buy a few pink 0000 outfits for her, but she can use Andrews.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   daikini  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Lower Hutt
    Points: 4490
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 17 July 2006 at 8:26am | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   Kiya was 7lb 13, and I had quite a few 0000 things for her, which fitted her well, as did the cute 000 outfits I put on top (and rolled the sleeves/legs up).
 
 Josiah was 7lb, although we (midwife included) expected him to be a little bigger.  We had lots of 0000 stuff, but they were too big!  He lived in a couple of Bonds Gro-suits and one or two premmy-sized things until he was big enough to wear the 0000 stuff at about 3 months old.  Now, he's 14 months and 9kg and wearing 00 clothes (rolled up)!
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     Becca, mum of 2 girls & 3 boys
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   aimeejoy  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Dannevirke
    Points: 6415
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 17 July 2006 at 9:17am | 
 
 
  
   
   
   Oh my, Hannah is bigger than Josiah now at 9 months!    Just goes to show the huge range of "normal"...
     
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     Aimee
 
 Hannah 22/10/05
 Greer 11/02/08
 
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   daikini  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Lower Hutt
    Points: 4490
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 17 July 2006 at 9:43am | 
 
 
  
   
   
   Josiah is little, though...     He's been bang on the 3% line (on the WellChild graph) for length and weight his whole life, compared to his big sister who is right on the 50% line!
 I don't know what to expect this time    , but I think Xavier will be a little bigger than Josiah was... just as long Xav doesn't become bigger than JP before they are old enough to understand!
     
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     Becca, mum of 2 girls & 3 boys
     
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   kellverona  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
   
  
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Location: Hervey Bay Australia
    Points: 817
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 17 July 2006 at 11:00am | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   my friend had a 13 pounder. Yikes!!!! 
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   
   | 
 
 
    | 
 
 
  
   
   mummy_becks  
   
    Senior Member
   
  
    
   
  Joined: 01 January 1900
    Points: 14931
   | 
  
   
      Post Options
    
        Thanks(0)
    
        Quote   Reply
   
     Posted: 17 July 2006 at 11:04am | 
 
 
  | 
   
    
   Ouch that would have to hurt. DH was 11 lb 4 and I was 9 lb 15 and 1/2 so more or less 10lb so people are still telling Andrew should have been bigger. Andrew was still in 0000 clothes at 3 months it was so cute. Now at aged 2 and 3 months he's in size 2 and some size 3 clothes.
    
   
   | 
 
 
  | 
   
     
     I was a puree feeder, forward facing, cot sleeping, pram pushing kind of Mum... and my kids survived!
     
   
   | 
 
 
    |