New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - I’m surprised...
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Forum LockedI’m surprised...

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Mazzy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Waikato
Points: 1494
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Mazzy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 5:05pm
We got told at antenatal that most first babies were late. Then 7 of us went early and 4 were late. A couple of us were induced early/had c-sections due to complications, so I guess that pushes the early figures up. Might be a different story if the poll asked how many people went into spontaneous labour with their first early/on dates/late.
Mum to two gorgeous girls!
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
my4beauties View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: NZ
Points: 6264
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote my4beauties Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 5:14pm
My first 2 were early, then Jett was on his due date.
My babies:

R (9),G (7), J (5)

Back to Top
Bizzy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 10974
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bizzy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 5:30pm
Originally posted by Maya Maya wrote:

Originally posted by GandT GandT wrote:

i dont think the poll is very accurate - the results for the last one kept changing, higher, then lower... etc....


It recalculates each time a new vote is received. I can view the back end stats and it is accurate.


would that be why the "on time" category has gone down from when i looked at it earlier today?

Back to Top
FionaS View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 17 April 2007
Location: Auckland
Points: 5117
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FionaS Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 5:32pm
I guess it would...the percentages are proportional so if one goes up the other goes down...
Mummy to Gabrielle and Ashley
Back to Top
Maya View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 16 September 2003
Location: Sydney
Points: 23297
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Maya Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 7:16pm
Originally posted by FionaS FionaS wrote:

I guess it would...the percentages are proportional so if one goes up the other goes down...


Exactly!
Maya Grace (28/02/03)
(02/01/06)
The Gremlins:Sienna Marie & Mercedes Kailah (14/10/06)
Lil miss:Chiara Louise Chloe (09/07/08)
Her ladyship:Rosalia Sophie Anais (18/06/12)
Back to Top
Bizzy View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 10974
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Bizzy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22 February 2008 at 7:39pm
Originally posted by Maya Maya wrote:

Originally posted by FionaS FionaS wrote:

I guess it would...the percentages are proportional so if one goes up the other goes down...


Exactly!


ok i understand now... i'm a bit of a maths dummy!!!

Back to Top
my2angels View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Points: 3943
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote my2angels Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 February 2008 at 8:03am
maybe there should be an 'early by intervention' option cos I guess a lot of the early ones bubs might not have actually been ready but for medical reasons were delivered. Kobe was spontaneous prem labour but Addison (although not my first) was early but she was induced.
Back to Top
jack_&_charli View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: christchurch
Points: 7155
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote jack_&_charli Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 February 2008 at 8:15pm
that's a good point robyn......jack was a week early because he was breech, so i had him by elective c/s

charli was a week overdue, despite my m/w telling me i wouldn't have to worry about being overdue!

Back to Top
KH25 View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member
Avatar

Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: Cambridge
Points: 1972
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote KH25 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 February 2008 at 8:20pm
Yeah my midwife told me 80% of first babies were overdue. Someone forgot to tell Ashleigh that though
Kelly, mum to DD, 19Jun06 (26wks 1lb15oz) DS1, 24Oct10 (32wks 4lb11oz) and DS2, 31Dec11 (32wks, 4lb11)
Back to Top
busymum View Drop Down
Senior Member
Senior Member


Joined: 01 January 1900
Location: New Zealand
Points: 12236
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote busymum Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24 February 2008 at 8:57pm
Originally posted by daikini daikini wrote:

Kiya was probably early (based on appearance at birth, we've no idea when she was actually due)

Josiah was born on his due date

Xavier was born 15 minutes after his due date... so if he hadn't sat around for half an hour 4mm away from crowning he probably would have been born on his due date

Nat and I were both born on our due dates


The punctual L-- family! Makes a good excuse for post-birth being late events
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 1.922 seconds.